How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions

Dahlsrud, Alexander

doi:10.1002/csr.132

Cited by 3,103 publications

(2,384 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

2,072

Contrasting

Unclassified

278

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it is clear that with regards to CSR, one size does not fit all, and organisations in different industries will be motivated to be involved in CSR for differing reasons and face barriers to implementation (Coles, Fenclova & Dinan, 2013). Thus, research on CSR in one organisation is unlikely to be directly applicable across similar organisations, let alone across other industries (Dahlsrud, 2008). Therefore, research on CSR in industries other than tourism is unlikely to be applicable to tourism.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. (2015) 'Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour.', Tourism management., 48 . pp. 399-413. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman. 2014.12.015 Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Tourism Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re ected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A de nitive version was subsequently published in Tourism Management, 48, June 2015, 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.12.015 . Additional information:Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, these models offer little engagement with power dynamics in the heritage tourism context. Corporate social responsibility, as an evolving and socially-constructed concept, has been interpreted in a variety of ways (Dahlsrud 2008). According to Li and Fu (2014) the three most representative are the "three concentric circles definition of social responsibility" proposed by the Committee for Economic Development , the "pyramid of corporate social responsibility" proposed by , and the "triple bottom line" conception proposed by Elkington (1997).…”

Section: The Limited Explanatory Power Of Responsibility Models In Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Categories of the latter include ' corporate social responsibility ' ( CSR;Coles et al 2013;Dahlsrud 2008;Elkington 1997;Henderson 2007;Li and Fu 2014), 'responsible tourism/tourist behavior' (RT; Frey and George 2010;Goodwin and Francis 2003;Lee et al 2013;Stanford 2008;Weeden 2013;Han et al 2016) , ' destination social responsibility' ( DSR; Ma et al 2013;Su et al 2016;Su and Swanson 2017;Su and Huang 2012) , and a broader and more general notion of 'responsibility' within the tourism context (Goodwin 2011;Grimwood and Doubleday 2013;Grimwood et al 2015;Hall and Brown 2006). These models have been formulated to cope with the negative impacts of tourism development and to improve sustainability and tourist experiences alike (Goodwin 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing Heritage Responsibility in World Heritage Sites: Insights from Levinas’ Ethics of Responsibility

Zhang¹

2017

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The concept of responsibility has always been closely tied to notions of powers and rights. However, current responsibility models such as ' corporate social responsibility' , ' responsible tourism' , and ' destination social responsibility' are limited in their explanations of stakeholders' powers and rights in the heritage tourism context. The current conceptualization of heritage responsibility poses a number of challenges, such as complicated subjects, ambivalent direction, and vague logic. Moreover, engaging with problems such as the asymmetric relationship between responsibility and rights, and the vague relationship between subject and object of responsibility, has been hampered by a lack of sufficient philosophical grounding. The paper addresses this gap by reanalyzing responsibility in the heritage tourism context using Levinas' ethics of responsibility. This study argues the following: a) Heritage responsibility is an ethical responsibility that agents undertake in the process of identifying, interpreting and representing heritage. This type of responsibility points not only to the subject-object ( heritage) level, but also the intersubjective level, and consists of not only responsibility-for-the-self, but also responsibility-for-the-other. b) Heritage responsibility, from the perspective of Levinas' ethics of responsibility, features passivity, infinity, asymmetry, and preoriginariness, which accounts for the unequal distribution of rights and responsibilities in heritage conservation. c) Given these features of heritage responsibility, the discursive power of stakeholders must be recognized in order to ensure that agents with authority assume their share of responsibility. This paper further discusses the relationship between heritage responsibility and self-identity, cultural identity, and discursive power relations, and outlines issues for future research.Keywords: Heritage responsibility; responsibility-for-the-other; heritage tourism 79 Abstract: The concept of responsibility has always been closely tied to notions of powers and rights. However, current responsibility models such as 'corporate social responsibility', 'responsible tourism', and 'destination social responsibility' are limited in their explanations of stakeholders' powers and rights in the heritage tourism context. The current conceptualization of heritage responsibility poses a number of challenges, such as complicated subjects, ambivalent direction, and vague logic. Moreover, engaging with problems such as the asymmetric relationship between responsibility and rights, and the vague relationship between subject and object of responsibility, has been hampered by a lack of sufficient philosophical grounding. The paper addresses this gap by reanalyzing responsibility in the heritage tourism context using Levinas' ethics of responsibility. This study argues the following: a) Heritage responsibility is an ethical responsibility that agents undertake in the process of identifying, interpreting and representing heritage. This ty...

show abstract

“…gestión ética y calidad de vida institucional, gestión medioambiental responsable, formación académica socialmente responsable, investigación socialmente útil y gestión social del conocimiento responsable (Alvarado & Schlesinger, 2008;Hill, 2004;Dahlsrud, 2008;Vallaeys, 2007). La hipótesis correspondiente se plantea de la siguiente manera:…”

Section: Planteamientos Teóricos E Hipótesisunclassified

Gestión De Recursos Intangibles en Instituciones De Educación Superior

Guerrero

Rodríguez‐Monroy

2015

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

GESTIÓN DE RECURSOS INTANGIBLES EN INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR Gestão de recursos intangíveis em instituições de ensino superior Management of intangible resources at higher education institutions RESUMENLas organizaciones se desenvuelven en entornos exigentes y competitivos creados por demandas de las sociedades y marcados por la crisis financiera mundial a la que no escapan las Instituciones de Educación Superior (IES), que están orientadas a satisfacer las necesidades del entorno y a fortalecer el flujo de información y colaboración con la sociedad. En este contexto se plantea una investigación de tipo exploratorio y descriptivo, que se considera como un primer intento por desarrollar y probar empíricamente los aspectos teóricos existentes sobre el tema. El objetivo es determinar las influencias simultáneas que ejercen los recursos intangibles sobre la gestión estratégica en las IES. Estas relaciones se evaluaron con un análisis de estructuras de covarianzas que requirió la construcción y validación de un sistema de medida adecuado para cada una de las variables objeto de estudio. Dicho análisis arrojó como resultado que sólo dos de las cuatro hipótesis planteadas son significativas, loque demuestra que los recursos intangibles Gestión del conocimiento y Reputación Organizacional, son los que influyen directamente en los procesos de gestión estratégica que realizan las IES. A partir de estos descubrimientos se dispone de referentes empíricos sobre la Gestión de Recursos Intangibles, destacando el hecho que la gestión estratégica en las IES puede mejorar sustancialmente a través de la implementación de procesos que involucren el manejo adecuado de los intangibles que poseen. PALABRAS CLAVE | Gestión estratégica, Instituciones de Educación Superior (IES), recursos intangibles, capital intelectual, Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales (MEE). RESUMO As organizações se desenvolvem em ambientes exigentes e competitivos criados pelas demandas das sociedades e marcados pela crise financeira mundial na qual não escapam as Instituições de Educação Superior (IES), que estão orientadas para satisfazer as necessidades do ambiente e para fortalecer o fluxo de informação e colaboração com a sociedade. Neste contexto, propõe-se uma pesquisa do tipo exploratória e descritiva, como uma primeira tentativa de desenvolver e provar empiricamente os aspectos teóricos existentes sobre o tema. O objetivo é determinar as influências simultâneas que os recursos intangíveis exercem sobre a gestão estratégica nas IES. Estas relações serão avaliadas com uma análise de estruturas de covariâncias requerida da construção e validação de um sistema de medida adequado para cada uma das variáveis do objeto de estudo. Como resultado da análise, somente duas das quatro hipóteses propostas são significativas, o que demonstra que os recursos intangíveis gestão do conhecimento e reputação organizacional são os que influem diretamente nos processos de gestão estratégica que realizam as IES. A partir destas descobertas, dispõe-se de referências ...

show abstract

How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions

Cited by 3,103 publications

References 21 publications

Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour

Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour

Conceptualizing Heritage Responsibility in World Heritage Sites: Insights from Levinas’ Ethics of Responsibility

Gestión De Recursos Intangibles en Instituciones De Educación Superior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About