2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr07203f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How did correlative atomic force microscopy and super-resolution microscopy evolve in the quest for unravelling enigmas in biology?

Abstract: This review provides a detailed picture of the innovative efforts to combine atomic force microscopy and different super-resolution microscopy techniques to elucidate biological questions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
(226 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The domain spacings measured by AFM and STORM are nearly identical (46.4 ± 3.7 nm and 46.8 ± 5.0 nm, respectively) for the same set of samples (i.e., prepared under the same conditions at the same time), providing further evidence that the nanoparticles are incorporated into the matrix and not isolated at the film surface. These cylinder-to-cylinder distances are well within the lateral resolving capabilities of both AFM and SMLM, whose correlative use has been on the rise in biology . More specifically, Cy3-aC′ dots generated on average 30 100 photons per localization event (see Figure S6), which translates to a mean localization uncertainty of 7.2 ± 1.1 nm.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The domain spacings measured by AFM and STORM are nearly identical (46.4 ± 3.7 nm and 46.8 ± 5.0 nm, respectively) for the same set of samples (i.e., prepared under the same conditions at the same time), providing further evidence that the nanoparticles are incorporated into the matrix and not isolated at the film surface. These cylinder-to-cylinder distances are well within the lateral resolving capabilities of both AFM and SMLM, whose correlative use has been on the rise in biology . More specifically, Cy3-aC′ dots generated on average 30 100 photons per localization event (see Figure S6), which translates to a mean localization uncertainty of 7.2 ± 1.1 nm.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These cylinder-tocylinder distances are well within the lateral resolving capabilities of both AFM and SMLM, 76 whose correlative use has been on the rise in biology. 77 More specifically, Cy3-aC′ dots generated on average 30 100 photons per localization event (see Figure S6), which translates to a mean localization uncertainty of 7.2 ± 1.1 nm. These values are remarkably consistent with those reported for Cy3-srC′ dots, 60 corroborating earlier studies that enhanced fluorescent behavior (over free dyes) is preserved despite the core compositional differences between aC′ and srC′ dots.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopes rely on specialized approaches to differentiate compounds of interest from the background. For instance, fluorescence microscopes rely on fluorescent-emitting chemicals and proteins for signal, bright-field microscopes generate contrast by attenuation of transmitted light in dense areas, while atomic force microscopes read out force and topographic measurements based on a sample's surface features [71][72][73][74]. Hence, the contrasting regime should be considered before commencing a project, to ensure the compatibility of chosen visualization schemes with the samples and expected outcomes of the project.…”
Section: Resolution Versus Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the progress in engineering and advanced microscopy, correlative techniques could solve these issues. Furthermore, the development of various correlative techniques has reduced the resolution of various techniques by as much as an order of magnitude [71,72]. The current status of correlative methods based on X-ray microscopy is presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Sxcm and Correlative Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%