2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How different types of users develop trust in technology: A qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the antecedents of trust in technology for active users and passive users working with a shared technology. According to the prominence-interpretation theory, to assess the trustworthiness of a technology, a person must first perceive and evaluate elements of the system that includes the technology. An experimental study was conducted with 54 participants who worked in two-person teams in a multi-task environment with a shared technology. Trust in technology was measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, from the view of an user and a software system interaction, trust is positively affected by the ease of navigation in the environment [25] [26] and the good use of elements of visual design [18]. The trust model discussed in [27], states that when an interface is consistent in terms of visual appearance, interaction elements (buttons, menus, etc.…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, from the view of an user and a software system interaction, trust is positively affected by the ease of navigation in the environment [25] [26] and the good use of elements of visual design [18]. The trust model discussed in [27], states that when an interface is consistent in terms of visual appearance, interaction elements (buttons, menus, etc.…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6,34 Conversely, distrust reduced the opportunity to use the system fully and hence decreased work productivity. 34 It was difficult to demonstrate a direct link between trust and the credibility of the information provided and how the information was used in daily clinical routines. 35 This could be due to the fact that, however good the Wound CDSS is, it cannot mimic the human mind in decision making.…”
Section: Theme 2: Beliefs In the Wound Clinical Decision Support Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Trust can also serve a moderating role in group performance. Additionally, trust plays an integrative role in several contexts such as cross‐cultural relationships (e.g., Chua, Morris, & Mor, ), leadership (e.g., Kacmar, Bachrach, Harris, & Noble, ), and technology users (e.g., Xu, Le, Deitermann, & Montague, ).…”
Section: Trust In Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%