2017
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Disclosure Features of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Interact with Investor Numeracy to Influence Investor Judgments

Abstract: Firms' Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports typically frame their strategies in terms of either community or global efforts (i.e., "strategy frame"). Further, the style used to depict CSR performance in reports often highlights either pictures or words (i.e., "presentation style"). These two prominent disclosure features of CSR reports promote a natural fit or misfit in the focus (relatively low-level or high-level focus) investors adopt when thinking about the firm and its CSR efforts. Further, these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Tan et al () construct a multidimensional sophistication measure based on participant demographic characteristics (such as the number of accounting and finance courses participants have taken, and their reported frequency of reading annual reports) and document that less sophisticated graduate business students are more likely to rely on language‐based heuristic processing of firm disclosures. Elliott et al () find similar results using a measure of numeracy. Han and Tan () also document that graduate business students who lack detailed, context‐specific knowledge are less likely to react to benchmarks implicitly associated with different forms of management guidance.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For example, Tan et al () construct a multidimensional sophistication measure based on participant demographic characteristics (such as the number of accounting and finance courses participants have taken, and their reported frequency of reading annual reports) and document that less sophisticated graduate business students are more likely to rely on language‐based heuristic processing of firm disclosures. Elliott et al () find similar results using a measure of numeracy. Han and Tan () also document that graduate business students who lack detailed, context‐specific knowledge are less likely to react to benchmarks implicitly associated with different forms of management guidance.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Pearson's chi-square test reveals that the difference between the lower-and higher-level 13. Prior accounting research informed by CLT (e.g., Backoff et al 2018;Elliott et al 2017) has employed more psych-based construal level manipulations. While this may be a cleaner manipulation, manipulations like these would not be able to be implemented jointly with the culture manipulation.…”
Section: Manipulation Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary dependent variable is investors' willingness to invest in the recommended stock which was measured by three questions similar to Elliott et al (2017). The first two questions asked participants to rate (1) the attractiveness of TecPipe's stock (1 = not attractive at all, 9 = very attractive) and (2) the likelihood that they will invest in TecPipe's stock (1 = very unlikely, 9 = very likely).…”
Section: Measure Of Primary Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss results and additional analyses in Section V and conclude the paper in Section VI. 5 Recently published papers that use CLT as the theoretical underpinning include Elliott, Grant, and Rennekamp (2017), Choi, Hecht, Tafkov, and Towry (2016), Elliott, Rennekamp, and White (2015), Rasso (2015), Taylor and Curtis (2013), and Koonce, Seybert, and Smith (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%