2019
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.16.877704
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do backward walking ants (Cataglyphis velox) cope with navigational uncertainty?

Abstract: 24Current opinion in insect navigation assumes that animals need to align with the goal 25 direction to recognise familiar views and approach it. Yet, ants sometimes drag 26 heavy food items backward to the nest and it is still unclear to what extent they rely 27 on visual memories while doing so. In this study displacement experiments and 28 alterations of the visual scenery reveal that ants do indeed recognise and use the 29 learnt visual scenery to guide their path while walking backward. In addition, the 3… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter requires computational steps, such as Fourier transforms, which potential implementation in insect circuits remains unknown. Instead, assuming an egocentric encoding enables to remain faithful to the known insect neural circuits and corroborates the behavioural evidence that ants’ visual scene recognition requires the insect to align its gaze as during training 66,7173 as well as the regular need of insects to scan multiple directions 21,42,49,74,75 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter requires computational steps, such as Fourier transforms, which potential implementation in insect circuits remains unknown. Instead, assuming an egocentric encoding enables to remain faithful to the known insect neural circuits and corroborates the behavioural evidence that ants’ visual scene recognition requires the insect to align its gaze as during training 66,7173 as well as the regular need of insects to scan multiple directions 21,42,49,74,75 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…3). Also, since all views becomes useful whatever their orientation, it explains how views acquired during outbound trips can be equally categorised effectively to serve subsequent homing 46,73,78 , as well as the ants' ability to recognise views whatever their body orientation when on highly familiar regions 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Views facing the nest may as well be included during learning and categorised as left, right or both, explaining why most ants facing their goal usually choose to turn in one particular Revisiting current questions in insect and robot navigation such as early exploration, route following and homing 20,[46][47][48][49] ; the integration of aversive memories 8,24,50 , path integration and views ( [51][52][53][54] or other sensory modalities ( 55-58 as well as seeking for underlying neural correlates [5][6][7] -with such a lateralised design as a framework promises an interesting research agenda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various insect navigational behaviour have been investigated with such an approach: path integration [14], the use of learnt terrestrial cues [15], wind and olfaction [16], [17], obstacle avoidance [18], route optimisation [19], [20], sequence learning [21], [22] or navigation backwards [23], [24]. Below, we focus on behavioural models of route following and visual homing in ants and bees, because these illustrate well the importance of considering the 'brain-body-environment' dynamics at play.…”
Section: Models From 'Behaviour' To 'Computation' (Level 3 <-> Level 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%