How do borders influence migration? Insights from open and closed border regimes in the three Guianas

Abstract

The ways border regimes affect migration patterns remain ambiguous. Closed borders may constrain migration but also encourage migrants to pursue alternative migration channels and destinations. While open borders may be associated with higher migration, oftentimes they promote circulation and return. To clarify how different border regimes influence migration patterns, this article examines the impact of open and closed border regimes on migration outcomes in Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana in the 1950s–1980s period, when all three gained independence or non-sovereign status and colonial ties were strong. The article proposes a conceptual schematic model that can accommodate varied post-colonial political and border regime transitions and explains changes in the timing, destination and composition of migration. The analysis finds that, counterintuitively, closed borders can lead to high emigration while open borders can encourage people to stay. The proposed model also illustrates the relevance of three dimensions of time: the historical juncture, the sequence of change and the time span. In sum, rather than preventing migration, border regimes yield important effects that lead to migration diversification.

Bordering Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourses of Marine Le Pen and Eric Zemmour

“…While the concept of the border has undergone extensive analysis in relation to globalization, politics, migration, and culture (Schmidtke 2021;Vezzoli 2021;Calabrò 2021;Gheorghiu 2020), there is a limited body of research specifically dedicated to populist discourse on borders. Some studies delve into the symbolism of the border wall in political populist communication (Demata 2022;Espejo 2019), while others examine the emotional dynamics of border discourses (Beurskens 2022).…”

“So, if you ask whether fences work: they work”—the role of border fortifications for migration control and access to asylum. Comparing Hungary and the USA

“…At the same time, the effectiveness of borders is questioned (Linebarger & Braithwaite, 2022;Vallet, 2021): Several authors conclude that fences do not effectively prevent smuggling and migration or provide security (Getmansky et al, 2019;Vernon & Zimmermann, 2019). Border closure does not always lead to less migration, but can even have the opposite effect (Schon & Leblang, 2021;Vezzoli, 2021). Discussing the efficiency of fences, however, means assessing them (only) against the officially stated goals.…”

A Statistical Analysis of the Migration Process: A Case Study—Romania

“…Labor mobility is thus determined by the characteristics of contemporary industry, and this mobility, which involves a change of occupation, profession and field of activity obviously does not take place without territorial movements, i.e., population migration [32]. The economic factors that cause the mobility of the population are conditioned by the need [33] for the movement of capital, the production process and the forces of production.…”