How do competing influences of selection history interact? A commentary on Luck et al. (2021)

Pearson, Daniel; Watson, Poppy; Pelley, Mike E. Le

doi:10.1080/13506285.2021.1912234

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While cognitive priority map models have offered parsimonious explanations of changes in discrimination performance, RTs, and gaze trajectories, they often disagree on when and how salient items capture attention (Luck et al, 2021). One central issue limiting the ability to adjudicate among competing models is that there is no well-established method for quantitatively measuring now neural activity indexes the relative salience of different aspects of stimulus displays (Chang et al, 2021;Gaspelin & Luck, 2021;Pearson et al, 2021). Our findings may offer a practical solution to this challenge.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Feature-Specific Salience Maps in Human Cortex

Thayer,

Sprague

2023

J. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Priority map theory is a leading framework for understanding how various aspects of stimulus displays and task demands guide visual attention. Per this theory, the visual system computes a priority map, which is a representation of visual space indexing the relative importance—orpriority—of locations in the environment. Priority is computed based on both salience—defined based on image-computable properties—and relevance—defined by an individual’s current goals, and is used to direct attention to the highest-priority locations for further processing. Computational theories suggest that priority maps identify salient locations based on individual feature dimensions (e.g., color, motion), which are integrated into an aggregate priority map. While widely accepted, a core assumption of this framework—the existence of independent feature dimension maps in visual cortex—remains untested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that retinotopic regions selective for specific feature dimensions (color or motion) in human cortex act as neural feature dimension maps, indexing salient locations based on their preferred feature. We used fMRI activation patterns to reconstruct spatial maps while male and female human participants viewed stimuli with salient regions defined by relative color or motion direction. Activation in reconstructed spatial maps was localized to the salient stimulus position in the display. Moreover, the strength of the stimulus representation was strongest in the ROI selective for the salience-defining feature. Together, these results suggest that feature-selective extrastriate visual regions highlight salient locations based on local feature contrast within their preferred feature dimensions, supporting their role as neural feature dimension maps.Significance StatementIdentifying salient information is important for navigating the world. For example, it is critical to detect a quickly approaching car when crossing the street. Leading models of computer vision and visual search rely on compartmentalized salience computations based on individual features; however, there has been no direct empirical demonstration identifying neural regions as responsible for performing these dissociable operations. Here, we provide evidence of a critical double dissociation that neural activation patterns from color-selective regions prioritize the location of color-defined salience while minimally representing motion-defined salience, whereas motion-selective regions show the complementary result. These findings reveal that specialized cortical regions act as neural ‘feature dimension maps’ that are used to index salient locations based on specific features to guide attention.

show abstract