How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment

Russo, Yuri; Berchicci, Marika; Russo, Francesco Di; Vannozzi, Giuseppe

doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.006

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies compared the MRCP under different stepping conditions. Gait initiation or stepping in the backward direction produced larger amplitude MRCPs than the forward direction ( Do Nascimento et al, 2005 ; Russo et al, 2019 ; Berchicci et al, 2020 ). Forward gait initiation produced smaller amplitude MRCPs than step-up, side-step, backward step, and stand-to-sit movements ( Jochumsen and Niazi, 2020b ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Ten studies utilized a between-group, cross-sectional design, where two groups (e.g., experts versus novices) performed one movement task ( Mann et al, 2011 ; Wright et al, 2012b ; Khanmohammadi et al, 2015 ; Vogt et al, 2017 ; Skrzeba and Vogt, 2018 ), or where two groups performed multiple movement tasks ( O’connor, 1986 ; Vidailhet et al, 1993 , 1995 ; Berchicci et al, 2017 ; Fearon et al, 2021 ). Twelve studies investigated multiple EEG measurement or signal processing techniques ( Khaliliardali et al, 2012 , 2015 ; Singh et al, 2016 ; Jeong et al, 2017 ; Sburlea et al, 2017 ; Rashid et al, 2018 ; Eilbeigi and Setarehdan, 2018a , b ; Karimi and Jiang, 2019 ; Moinnereau et al, 2019 ; Russo et al, 2019 ; Schwarz et al, 2020a ). The six experimental studies consisted of two randomized controlled trials ( Mizusaki et al, 2019 ; Peters et al, 2020 ), one non-randomized controlled trial ( Fromer et al, 2016 ), one randomized cross-over trial ( Barthel et al, 2001 ), one non-randomized cross-over trial ( Mrachacz-Kersting et al, 2019a ), and one non-controlled trial ( Wright et al, 2012a ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ten articles investigated different EEG measurement or processing systems during mobility-related tasks ( Bulea et al, 2014 ; Sburlea et al, 2015a , b , 2017 ; Jeong et al, 2017 ; Rashid et al, 2018 ; Karimi and Jiang, 2019 ; Russo et al, 2019 ; Chaisaen et al, 2020 ; Jochumsen and Niazi, 2020b ). Findings from all but one of these studies ( Russo et al, 2019 ) demonstrated that the MRCP signal could be successfully classified or enhanced using multiple techniques (this was not the aim of Russo et al, 2019 ). Accuracy rates varied when using the different signal processing techniques, but similar accuracies were reported when comparing healthy and stroke participants ( Sburlea et al, 2015b , 2017 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They also found a processing window of greater than 3 s sufficient to provide reliable classification. Two studies ( Singh et al, 2016 ; Russo et al, 2019 ) compared the effect of different means of synchronization. It was reported that the peak negativity of the MRCP occurred earlier when synchronizing the EEG to EMG compared with gyroscope data ( Singh et al, 2016 ), while synchronization of the EEG using a force plate was associated with MRCPs of greater amplitude compared to synchronization with EMG or stereophotogrammetry ( Russo et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…FIGURE 2 | Flow chart detailing screening process. Singh et al, 2016;Jeong et al, 2017;Sburlea et al, 2017;Rashid et al, 2018;Eilbeigi and Setarehdan, 2018a,b;Karimi and Jiang, 2019;Moinnereau et al, 2019;Russo et al, 2019;Schwarz et al, 2020a). The six experimental studies consisted of two randomized controlled trials (Mizusaki et al, 2019;Peters et al, 2020), one non-randomized controlled trial (Fromer et al, 2016), one randomized cross-over trial (Barthel et al, 2001), one non-randomized cross-over trial (Mrachacz-Kersting et al, 2019a), and one non-controlled trial (Wright et al, 2012a).…”

Section: Study Designsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Electroencephalographic Recording of the Movement-Related Cortical Potential in Ecologically Valid Movements: A Scoping Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) is a brain signal that can be recorded using surface electroencephalography (EEG) and represents the cortical processes involved in movement preparation. The MRCP has been widely researched in simple, single-joint movements, however, these movements often lack ecological validity. Ecological validity refers to the generalizability of the findings to real-world situations, such as neurological rehabilitation. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the research evidence investigating the MRCP in ecologically valid movement tasks. A search of six electronic databases identified 102 studies that investigated the MRCP during multi-joint movements; 59 of these studies investigated ecologically valid movement tasks and were included in the review. The included studies investigated 15 different movement tasks that were applicable to everyday situations, but these were largely carried out in healthy populations. The synthesized findings suggest that the recording and analysis of MRCP signals is possible in ecologically valid movements, however the characteristics of the signal appear to vary across different movement tasks (i.e., those with greater complexity, increased cognitive load, or a secondary motor task) and different populations (i.e., expert performers, people with Parkinson’s Disease, and older adults). The scarcity of research in clinical populations highlights the need for further research in people with neurological and age-related conditions to progress our understanding of the MRCPs characteristics and to determine its potential as a measure of neurological recovery and intervention efficacy. MRCP-based neuromodulatory interventions applied during ecologically valid movements were only represented in one study in this review as these have been largely delivered during simple joint movements. No studies were identified that used ecologically valid movements to control BCI-driven external devices; this may reflect the technical challenges associated with accurately classifying functional movements from MRCPs. Future research investigating MRCP-based interventions should use movement tasks that are functionally relevant to everyday situations. This will facilitate the application of this knowledge into the rehabilitation setting.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Designsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Electroencephalographic Recording of the Movement-Related Cortical Potential in Ecologically Valid Movements: A Scoping Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Stepping forward, stepping backward: a movement-related cortical potential study unveils distinctive brain activities

Berchicci

Russo

Bianco

et al. 2020

Behavioural Brain Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neuroplasticity of Cortical Planning for Initiating Stepping Poststroke: A Case Series

Peters

Ivanova

Lakhani

et al. 2020

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Purpose: Therapeutic exercise improves balance and walking ability in individuals after stroke. The extent to which motor planning improves with therapeutic exercise is unknown. This case series examined how outpatient physical therapy affects motor planning and motor performance for stepping. Case Description: Individuals poststroke performed self-initiated stepping before (baseline), after (postintervention), and 1 month after (retention) intervention. Amplitude and duration of the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) was measured using an electroencephalograph from the Cz electrode. Electromyography (EMG) of biceps femoris (BF) was collected. Additionally, clinical measures of motor impairment and function were evaluated at all 3 time points by a blinded assessor. Intervention: Two types of outpatient physical therapy were performed for 6 weeks: CONVENTIONAL (n = 3) and FAST (n = 4, Fast muscle Activation and Stepping Training). Outcomes: All 7 participants reduced MRCP duration, irrespective of the type of physical therapy. The MRCP amplitude and BF EMG onset changes were more variable. Clinical outcomes improved or were maintained for all participants. The extent of motor impairment was associated with MRCP amplitude. Discussion: Changes in MRCP duration suggest that outpatient physical therapy may promote neuroplasticity of motor planning of stepping movements after stroke; however, a larger sample is needed to determine whether this finding is valid. This case series suggests motor planning for initiating stepping may improve after 6 weeks of outpatient physical therapy for persons with stroke. Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A307).

show abstract

How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment

Cited by 3 publications

References 39 publications

Electroencephalographic Recording of the Movement-Related Cortical Potential in Ecologically Valid Movements: A Scoping Review

Electroencephalographic Recording of the Movement-Related Cortical Potential in Ecologically Valid Movements: A Scoping Review

Stepping forward, stepping backward: a movement-related cortical potential study unveils distinctive brain activities

Neuroplasticity of Cortical Planning for Initiating Stepping Poststroke: A Case Series

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About