Ensuring participation in Higher Engineering Education (HEE) is crucial for achieving educational equity and social justice [1]. However, the lack of participation has been a persistent problem in the worldwide HEE, demonstrated by dimensions of educational access and success. The former refers to the fact that disadvantaged students are excluded from educational opportunities; and the latter means even after widening disadvantaged learners' accessibility to HEE, they are less likely to achieve desired learning outcomes [2]. The challenge in HEE lies in who can access high-quality opportunities and how to enhance student success post-accessibility [3]. Marginson[4] emphasizes that true equity in education requires behavioral change, not just an increased presence of disadvantaged learners in elite universities. The capability stance, as proposed by Amartya Sen [5,6], highlights the importance of providing valued opportunities and building self-determining agency in students [4,7]. This approach focus on personal, social, and environmental factors that turn capabilities into desired outcomes [6,8]. However, it does not specify how to effectively convert these possibilities into desired learning outcomes. The social cognitive perspective on self-regulated learning provides insights into this conversion process, which will be discussed later.