How do external territorial threats affect mass killing?

Abstract

The current scholarship on mass killing demonstrates that genocide and other forms of mass murder are usually policy responses to threats, emphasizing armed conflict and political upheaval, such as revolution, as important causal factors. However, scholars have so far had little to say about the relationship between a country’s external threat environment and mass killing. We argue that a country’s external security environment, particularly when its neighbors pose threats to its territorial integrity, is a critical and understudied factor shaping a leader’s decision to employ mass killing. External territorial threats can produce domestic in-group/out-group dynamics, heightening fears that some domestic groups may be supporting or colluding with the enemy. Yet, given the availability of alternative policies and the enormous costs of mass killing, territorial threats alone do not suffice to explain why a state chooses mass killing over other types of violent or nonviolent strategies. Only when leaders are committed to exclusionary ideologies, are territorial threats more likely to catalyze hatred and fear of domestic out-groups, increasing a leader’s willingness to direct massive violence against them. Such leaders are more likely to frame domestic out-groups as inherently threatening and as enemies to be eliminated. Our empirical analysis reveals that a country’s territorial threat, measured by either territorial rivalries or territorial claims, is associated with a greater likelihood of mass killing onset only when leaders hold exclusionary ideologies.

Latent territorial threat and democratic regime reversals

“…Lingering territorial conflict can be linked to a number of political processes and variables, including democratization, regional democratic patterns, admission to democracy-sustaining IGOs, political centralization, mobilization, political intolerance, and even mass killing (see e.g. Hong & Kim, 2019). Some of these variables are central to the aforementioned risk factors for regime reversals as well as the more direct dynamics of regime reversals.…”

Introducing the Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion Dataset

“…Thus, the GSME dataset has important utility for improved theoretical understanding of when, where, and why mass expulsion occurs, who is targeted, and how mass expulsion relates to other exclusionary politics concepts. This dataset offers new possibilities for researchers examining expulsion as a dependent variable, or as an explanatory variable, across many fields including conflict processes (Uzonyi, 2018; Hong & Kim, 2019), forced displacement and labor migration (Adamson & Tsourapas, 2020), nationalist and secessionist movements (Shelef, 2020), and the diffusion of human rights norms (Krain, 2012).…”