2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-009-9533-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do follower reef fishes find nuclear fishes?

Abstract: Among reef fishes, it is common for "follower" individuals to accompany "nuclear" species and to feed on prey uncovered by their foraging. In this study, I examine the cues used by followers to find nuclear fish. A model of a ubiquitous nuclear fish was maintained immobile or moved to disturb the substratum and the number of fish species and individuals attracted was compared to control treatments. The results showed that: 1) bottom disturbance was the strongest attraction factor for follower reef fishes; 2) v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Substrate disturbance is one of the most important predictors for the species acting as nuclear (Sazima et al, 2007;Krajewski, 2009). This is consistent with the results of the present study, since nuclear dominant species (P. lineatus and L. macrocephalus), that accounted for 93.4% of interactions, feed on benthic resources, causing the suspension of sediment during their feeding activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substrate disturbance is one of the most important predictors for the species acting as nuclear (Sazima et al, 2007;Krajewski, 2009). This is consistent with the results of the present study, since nuclear dominant species (P. lineatus and L. macrocephalus), that accounted for 93.4% of interactions, feed on benthic resources, causing the suspension of sediment during their feeding activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The positive relationship between the attraction of followers and disturbance in the bottom during nuclear species activities has been observed in other studies (Matsumoto & Kohda, 2001;Krajewski, 2009). For example, Matsumoto & Kohda (2001) observed, in southern Japan, that the performance of repeated bites instead of simple bites by individuals of the reef fish Goniistius zonatus (=Cheilodactylus zonatus) resulted in greater substrate disturbance and, consequently, greater availability of food for the followers, increasing frequency and duration of the feeding association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although such interactions are commonly recorded in marine environments (Strand, 1988;Lukoschek & McCormick, 2000;Sazima et al, 2006;Sazima et al, 2007), there are studies on such interactions in tropical freshwater environments as well, mostly in tropical waters (e.g., Baker & Foster, 1994;Leitão et al, 2007;Ott, 2007;Teresa & Carvalho, 2008;Garrone-Neto & Sazima, 2009;Teresa et al, 2011). Despite efforts to describe this type of association, knowledge of its modulating factors is still incipient (see Sazima et al, 2005;Krajewski, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the importance of bottom disturbance was emphasized by Krajewski (2009), who experimentally demonstrated that bottom disturbance is a factor more important than the identity of the nuclear species in attracting followers. Thus, the features directly or indirectly associated with sediment suspension would be important for the occurrence and variation in the composition of followers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of its feeding habits, such anostomid visibly played the nuclear role in the feeding associations herein described. While this role is not only performed by bottom disturbing organisms, substrate disturbance is considered a strong predictor of the nuclear task in a nuclear-follower association (Strand, 1988;Krajewski, 2009).…”
Section: Feeding Association Of Nuclear-following Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%