2021
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/sy2kd
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do Good and Bad News Impact Mood During the Covid-19 Pandemic? The Role of Similarity

Abstract: How do media reports about the Covid-19 pandemic influence our mood? Building on the social comparison theory, we predicted that reading negative news affecting a similar group would result in an impaired mood. In contrast, reading negative news about a dissimilar group should lead to improved mood. To test this, 150 undergraduate students read positive or negative news about the well-being of a similar or dissimilar group during the pandemic. As predicted, a mood assimilation effect occurred for similar group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it seems possible that the high network centrality of the perceived value of science is Covid-19 specific. People experienced the Covid-19 pandemic on a daily basis, for example, through governmental restrictions (Dohle et al, 2020) or media reports (Dörnemann et al, 2021). Perhaps, when thinking about such a pressing and directly relevant problem, it is crucial for the overall attitude whether science provides valuable knowledge for curbing the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it seems possible that the high network centrality of the perceived value of science is Covid-19 specific. People experienced the Covid-19 pandemic on a daily basis, for example, through governmental restrictions (Dohle et al, 2020) or media reports (Dörnemann et al, 2021). Perhaps, when thinking about such a pressing and directly relevant problem, it is crucial for the overall attitude whether science provides valuable knowledge for curbing the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions were asked with a special focus on Covid-19 related science, as participants were informed at the beginning of the survey that "The following questions are about the current Corona pandemic -from here on referred to as Corona". Only the question assessing general trust in science was asked before this specification, but it can be assumed that this context was nevertheless highly accessible, as the media routinely reported on the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences (Dörnemann et al, 2021;Zimmermann et al, 2021). Beyond assessing people's attitudes towards science, the questionnaire also included a few questions on trust in several non-scientific institutions (e.g., politics) and on how wellinformed participants felt about the Coronavirus, which are, however, not analysed in this article.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it seems possible that the high network centrality of the perceived value of science is COVID-19 specific. People experienced the COVID-19 pandemic on a daily basis, for example, through governmental restrictions (Dohle et al, 2020) or media reports (Dörnemann et al, 2021). Perhaps, when thinking about such a pressing and directly relevant problem it is crucial for the overall attitude whether science provides valuable knowledge for curbing the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions were asked with a special focus on COVID-19 related science, as participants were informed at the beginning of the survey that "The following questions are about the current Corona pandemicfrom here on referred to as Corona". Only the question assessing general trust in science was asked before this specification, but it can be assumed that this context was nevertheless highly accessible, as the media routinely reported on the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences (Dörnemann et al, 2021;Zimmermann et al, 2021). Beyond assessing people's attitudes towards science, the questionnaire also included a few questions on trust in several non-scientific institutions (e.g., politics) and on how well-informed participants felt about the Coronavirus, which are however not analysed in this article.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because information can increase one's sense of control, reduce an aversive sense of uncertainty, and help guide action (for review Sharot & Sunstein, 2020). However, if the information revealed is negative or confusing, it can further increase anxiety (Johnston & Davey, 1997;Norr et al, 2014;Shabahang et al, 2020;Dörnemann et al, 2021). Thus, the information people seek out when anxious could have a beneficial or a damaging effect on their well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%