How do ideas and discourses construct youth policies? The case of Hong Kong

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the youth narratives of Mr Leung Chun-ying, the Chief Executive (CE) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government between 2012 and 2017, which steered the directions of youth policies in Hong Kong. Design/methodology/approach Informed by the ideational school of institutionalism, a qualitative documentary study was conducted to analyse the policy addresses, speeches, and blog posts delivered by the then CE, which were all available on the website of the HKSAR Government. It was through a thematic analysis of the database that themes and sub-themes were generated for the discussion. Representative verbatim quotes are used for illustrating some of the youth policy ideas and discourses promoted under the Leung’s regime. Findings The findings suggest that the governing youth narratives could be categorised into two interrelated themes: behavioural patriotism and economic opportunism. The notions of youth development constructed in the narratives of Leung shape the definition of youth-related problems and solutions in relation to national identity and global competition. Research limitations/implications This study focusses on the previous term of HKSAR Government that cannot fully reveal the extent of policy continuities and changes. Yet, it could outline the overall picture and address the shortcomings of Hong Kong’s current youth policies viewed from both normative and cognitive perspectives. Methodological and analytical implications can be drawn for further studies on policy ideas and discourses. Originality/value The paper has two major contributions; the first of which is the illustration of an analytical framework connecting contents, tools, and justification of policies for capturing the dynamics and complexities of youth policies. Second, the findings of this study develop a critical understanding of neoliberal youth policies in both economic and moral senses that pose new challenges to young people and policy makers.

Radicalism and Life Meaningfulness Among Hong Kong Youth

“…Radicalism in Hong Kong, particularly its Westernized youth, typically springs from the clash between Mainland Chinese culture upholding order and Westernized Hong Kong culture prioritizing freedom (K. Cheung, 2015 ; Zamecki, 2018 ). The clash consolidates with education, inculcating freedom, localism, or separation from Mainland China’s atheistic dominance (Wong & Au-Yeung, 2018 ; Zamecki, 2018 ). Such consolidation heightened radicalism in 2019 concerning the motion to surrender fugitives from Hong Kong to Mainland China when Hong Kong radicals asserted that the surrender was unfree and unjust (G. Tang et al, 2020 ).…”

Expediting youth's entry into employment whilst overlooking precariousness: Flexi‐employability and disciplinary activation in Hong Kong

“…Despite the introduction of the minimum wage in 2011, employment relations in Hong Kong arguably remain under‐institutionalized and individualized with high fluidity of the labor market, which implies the path dependence of labor market institutions. As an authoritarian regime, economic and employment growth is argued by some academics as an important source of political legitimation for the HKSAR Government (Chan, ; Wong & Au‐Yeung, ). This generates a dilemma for the government to stabilize the low employment rate without extensive intervention during times of economic downturn.…”