How do information flows affect impact from environmental research? - An analysis of a science-policy network

Ferré, Marie; Martín-Ortega, Julia; Gregorio, Monica Di; Dallimer, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115828

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing research has identified a need to support cooperation across Madagascar's different sectors and administrative levels, as well as improve communication between local authorities, researchers, and end‐users (Cinner et al, 2009; Raik & Decker, 2007). We note, however, that the transfer of information between stakeholders does not of itself guarantee the transformation of knowledge into action (Ferré et al, 2022). Likewise, implementation through farmers’ groups is often said to enhance adoption but may nonetheless require additional support to create a substantial impact (Kuntosch & König, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Living with rodent pests: Unifying stakeholder interests to prioritise pest management in rural Madagascar

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rodent pests can have major social, economic, and environmental impacts. Their management, therefore, represents a complex socio‐ecological problem involving a network of stakeholders from across different sectors, with diverging and sometimes competing interests. Failure to incorporate stakeholder interests can result in ineffective or unsustainable management programmes, with unintended negative consequences for people and nature. Participatory approaches to decision‐making have been proposed as suitable strategies to tackle complex problems, yet, these processes are often considered too difficult, costly, or time‐consuming to implement. To facilitate a participatory approach to rodent control in Madagascar, we identified and mapped key stakeholders and developed a multisector framework for guiding rodent management programmes based on current literature and expert recommendations. We then carried out interviews and focus groups with stakeholders and end‐users to validate the final framework. The final framework unifies stakeholder interests around the dimensions of People, Resources, Knowledge and Power. Combined application of the stakeholder map and framework provides decision‐makers with the tools to identify stakeholder interests; to explore areas of conflict, as well as areas of agreement; and to ensure that these are addressed within the design of control programmes. As an assessment tool, the framework can also be used to evaluate the responsiveness of programmes to the needs of different stakeholders and assess whether objectives are being reached. We recommend the application of the stakeholder map and framework to encourage and strengthen participatory approaches aimed at rodent pest control. Due to the inclusive and interdisciplinary nature of the framework, it can be applied to address numerous complex social, environmental, and economic issues across scales, sectors, and systems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

show abstract