How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms?

Arranz, Nieves; Arguello, Nohemi Lopez; Arróyabe, Juan Carlos Fernández de

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126692

Cited by 57 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the Construct de Eco-innovation, the statements (EI2) and (EI3) are shown with a percentage of above 92%, that is, 92.9% and 93.3, with averages of 4.56 and 4.59 and standard deviation of 0.744 and 0.735 respectively (Figure 1), showing that Eco-innovation reduces the impact on the environment and improves the quality of life on the planet, a result that corroborates the theoretical assumptions of Horton and Horton (2019), regarding environmental awareness acting as a catalyst for concerns on environmental impacts and bringing Eco-innovation as an essential factor to minimize such impacts (Jabbour et al, 2015;García-Sánchez et al, 2020). This also corroborates with the research by Mavi and Mavi (2021), in which Eco-innovation contributes to improving environmental performance and reducing the degradation of natural resources, as well as the development of environmental incentive policies (Arranz et al, 2021).…”

Section: Perceptions About Eco-innovationsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…However, eco-innovation differs from conventional innovation in that it is more related to external sources of information, using techniques related to the environment (Frigon, Doloreux & Shearmur, 2020;García -Sánchez, Gallego -Álvarez & Zafra -Gómez, 2020). However, although eco-innovation has been practiced in business for years, few studies have investigated eco-innovation Arranz, Arguello, and Arroyabe (2021) classify the eco-innovation engines into three categories: internal factors, market factors, and institutional factors. Also, according to the authors, the factor that most affects eco-innovation is the previous experiences in eco-innovation, in comparison with variables such as external financing or capacity for innovation, which have a very small impact.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

As relações entre a ecoinovação, consciência sustentável, estratégia ambiental, performance organizacional e impacto ambiental no nordeste do Brasil

Severo

Lima

Anjos³

et al. 2021

RIAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This article aims to analyze the relationship between eco-innovation, sustainable awareness, environmental strategy, organizational performance and environmental impact, in the face of 210 respondents from Northeast Brazil.Methodology: The methodology used was a quantitative and descriptive research, through a survey applied to 210 respondents, analyzed using descriptive statistics, statistical tests and multiple linear regression.Originality: Original with respect to the constructs developed for the research, where three constructs (eco-innovation, sustainable awareness and organizational performance) were adapted from the literature and two (environmental strategy and environmental impact) were developed by the researchers, as it is a model that has no empirical validation in the studied environment (Northeast Brazil). Understanding the relationships between the constructs is relevant, which are paramount for companies, for reducing the environmental impact and consequently improving the quality of life of people and the planet.Results: The results show that the most important relationship occurred with the factors that influence the reduction of the environmental impact, which presents as predictors, issues associated with the environmental strategy to reduce the degradation of natural habitats and long-term sustainability.Theoretical Contributions: The study statistically validated the Constructs and scales of research, so this Framework can be used by other researchers, as well as contributing to the advancement of academic studies related to the researched themes.

show abstract

Section: Perceptions About Eco-innovationsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

As relações entre a ecoinovação, consciência sustentável, estratégia ambiental, performance organizacional e impacto ambiental no nordeste do Brasil

Severo

Lima

Anjos³

et al. 2021

RIAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Constraints (Bunduchi et al 2015 ; Turker and Vural 2017 ; Malen and Vaaler 2017 ; Onsongo 2019 ; Arranz et al 2021 )…”

Section: Management Priorities For Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Network partnerships within this theme consider managing interactions in public-private (Kidd 1996;Rosário et al 2013), state-market (Yu 2020), and industry-academia (Krishnan and Jha 2012) partnerships. Literature also provides other (Bunduchi et al 2015;Turker and Vural 2017;Malen and Vaaler 2017;Onsongo 2019;Arranz et al 2021) Economic conditions, policies, and intermediaries…”

Section: Network Engagement Externalities and Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional innovation creates smart institutions that idiosyncratically thrive in a world of exponential change. Through policy-driven interventions and experiential learning, managers of institutions become adept at delivering praxis- and crisis-driven innovations required for survival and success. Similarly, the management of institutional innovation remains an interest in research due to links of this form of innovation to economic growth, and the demands of on-going major socioeconomic transformations due to technological advances, increased occurrences of major crises, and emerging socioeconomic challenges. Accordingly, a key question arising from the literature concerns the range of determinants and priorities that influence institutional innovation for delivering society value. Thus, the onus is on scholarship to capture and advance knowledge for harnessing the potency of institutional innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the current state of research on institutional innovation. Using the systematic review methodology, we identify and critically appraise 485 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 1969 and 2021. The review finds key determinants and management priorities with a view to developing a multi-level management model of institutional innovation. Guided by insights from the review, the article sets a research agenda for future management studies of institutional innovation.

show abstract

“…Previous experience [25,64] Technological capabilities [34,70] Green capabilities [34,69] Innovation capabilities [64] Knowledge development [25] Organizational innovation [33,67] Financial resources [34] Investment in tangible assets [67] Meso Market dynamics Competitive pressure [5] Customer and provider pressure [34,38,39…”

Section: Resources and Capabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants of Energy Efficient Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Engaging firms to generate and adopt energy efficient innovation is crucial for balancing energy needs for sustainable development. In addition, a reduction in energy consumption can address environmental problems and lower production costs by reducing materials and/or energy costs and costs related to compliance with regulations. Considering the lack of systematic reviews focused on the determinants of energy efficient innovation, we address this gap and set forth to enhance the body of knowledge in the field of energy efficient innovation. To achieve the research aim, a systematic literature review and qualitative content analysis were conducted. This study offers two contributions. First, the study distinguishes the determinants of energy efficient innovation in three levels: micro-level, meso-level, and macro-level. According to the findings, the following determinants of energy efficient innovation are highlighted at the micro-level: (1) cost savings; (2) previous experience; (3) technological capabilities; (4) green capabilities; (5) innovation capabilities; (6) knowledge development; (7) organizational innovations; (8) financial resources; (9) investment in tangible assets. Meanwhile, the determinants are distinguished at the meso-level: (1) competitive pressure; (2) customer and provider pressure; (3) external knowledge cooperation; (4) social pressure; (5) voluntary agreements. Finally, the determinants are disclosed at the macro-level: (1) government subsidies; (2) current or future regulation. Second, the study provides insights on the determinants of energy efficient innovation and sets an agenda for future research. The study demonstrates the need for further investigations on the drivers of energy efficient innovation as compared to general eco-innovation.

show abstract

How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms?

Cited by 57 publications

References 57 publications

As relações entre a ecoinovação, consciência sustentável, estratégia ambiental, performance organizacional e impacto ambiental no nordeste do Brasil

As relações entre a ecoinovação, consciência sustentável, estratégia ambiental, performance organizacional e impacto ambiental no nordeste do Brasil

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Determinants of Energy Efficient Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About