Abstract:Abstract:We investigate the valuation and the pricing of initial public offerings (IPOs) by investment banks for a unique dataset of 49 IPOs on Euronext Brussels in the 1993-2001 period. We find that for each IPO several valuation methods are used, of which Discounted Free Cash Flow (DFCF) is the most popular. The offer price is mainly based on DFCF valuation, to which a discount is applied. Our results suggest that DDM tends to underestimate value, while DFCF produces unbiased value estimates. When using mult… Show more
“…However, all these studies use ex-post value estimates produced by researchers to test the accuracy of valuations, and they typically find that IPO firms are overvalued at offer prices relative to their comparables. We are aware of only three other papers investigating the accuracy of the valuation models actually used by investment banks: Cassia et al (2004) in Italy, Roosenboom (2007) in France, and Deloof et al (2009) in Belgium. 1 All three studies take advantage of the extensive disclosure required of companies going public in Continental Europe and confirm that 1 Cassia et al (2004) examined the methods used by underwriters to value 83 IPOs in Italy during the period 1999-2002 and find that relative valuation is the approach more frequently adopted by underwriters (87% of the IPOs), closely followed by DCF (80%).…”
Section: The Valuation Of Iposmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the DCF model is more frequently used when aggregate stock market returns are high or volatile. Finally, Deloof et al (2009) studied 49 IPOs from the 1993-2001 period on the Brussels Stock Exchange and found that DCF is by far the most popular valuation method, being used to price all IPOs in the sample. the DCF model is widely adopted when valuing firms going public.…”
“…However, all these studies use ex-post value estimates produced by researchers to test the accuracy of valuations, and they typically find that IPO firms are overvalued at offer prices relative to their comparables. We are aware of only three other papers investigating the accuracy of the valuation models actually used by investment banks: Cassia et al (2004) in Italy, Roosenboom (2007) in France, and Deloof et al (2009) in Belgium. 1 All three studies take advantage of the extensive disclosure required of companies going public in Continental Europe and confirm that 1 Cassia et al (2004) examined the methods used by underwriters to value 83 IPOs in Italy during the period 1999-2002 and find that relative valuation is the approach more frequently adopted by underwriters (87% of the IPOs), closely followed by DCF (80%).…”
Section: The Valuation Of Iposmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the DCF model is more frequently used when aggregate stock market returns are high or volatile. Finally, Deloof et al (2009) studied 49 IPOs from the 1993-2001 period on the Brussels Stock Exchange and found that DCF is by far the most popular valuation method, being used to price all IPOs in the sample. the DCF model is widely adopted when valuing firms going public.…”
“…Although the underpricing of new equity has been widely researched for over two decades, recent studies have revitalised the interest in the underpricing puzzle (see Chen, Fauver & Yang, 2009, Deloof, Maeseneire & Inghelbrecht, 2009and Rocholl, 2009). This paper investigates the forces that shape price clustering in initial public offerings (IPOs).…”
a b s t r a c tThis is the first paper to systematically investigate price clustering in new equity assets using a high frequency transactions dataset. We test the hypotheses that past price information and market maker activities are related to price clustering. We report that price clustering in IPOs is substantially greater than the clustering observed for non-IPO assets, which supports the hypothesis that the decision of going public is followed by haziness about the true price. Underpricing is a significant determinant of price clustering for orderbook trades, which supports the notion that underpriced IPOs partially reflect price uncertainties. Tick size specifications can be restrictive for individual investors, while giving execution priority to market makers. The characteristics of price clustering for off-book trades differ substantially to price clustering in the order-book.
“…This can help to further explain the trade-off between higher (lower) wealth loss and higher (lower) insider retained ownership. However, the intrinsic values computed by underwriters and/or insiders are likely to be subjective (Deloof et al, 2009).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.