2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40841-019-00133-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do New Zealand Teachers Assess Children’s Oral Language and Literacy Skills at School Entry?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings are consistent with previous evaluations of the alignment of OTJs and children’s book level at age 6 (MoE, 2010b). In the first year of school, teachers commonly use observations of children’s oral reading (e.g., running records) to determine instructional book level (T. A. Cameron et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such findings are consistent with previous evaluations of the alignment of OTJs and children’s book level at age 6 (MoE, 2010b). In the first year of school, teachers commonly use observations of children’s oral reading (e.g., running records) to determine instructional book level (T. A. Cameron et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand skill development over time and respond to children’s educational needs, educators need tools that reflect growth (Clemens et al, 2018; Fuchs, 2004). Literacy progress in the first year of school in NZ is currently monitored via instructional book level (T. A. Cameron et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Book level. NZ teachers typically derive children's instructional book level via running records (94%; Cameron, Carroll, Taumoepeau, & Schaughency, 2019). Guidelines for conducting running records are provided by the MoE ( 2000), with instructional level operationalized as seen text which can be read with greater than 90% accuracy (e.g., MoE, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this usefulness, it is not common practice for teachers to routinely and systematically monitor children's oral language (Malec et al, 2017 ; Cameron et al, 2019 ). There is a paucity of research exploring teacher use of systematic language sampling in kindergarten/new entrant classrooms, and even less research into the development of technologies to support this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of research exploring teacher use of systematic language sampling in kindergarten/new entrant classrooms, and even less research into the development of technologies to support this. Cameron et al ( 2019 ) report on teachers' desire for tools to assess children's oral language, but time and knowledge are also cited as barriers to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%