Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
AimTo examine parents' perceptions of care quality at child health centres. Specific objectives were to examine parents' perceptions of the care received and the subjective importance of such care. Furthermore, to examine the relationship between parents' sociodemographic characteristics and the perceptions of care quality.DesignA cross‐sectional study.MethodsA random sample of parents of children born in Sweden in 2021 participated. Data were collected by the QPP‐CHC questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics.ResultsThe response rate was 19.4%. The targeted sample size of 210 participants was reached as 584 parents responded to the questionnaire. Parents' overall ratings of care quality at child health centres indicated optimal quality with mean values >3. However, various potential improvements areas were identified as needing additional information. These included dental care (m = 2.82), allergy prevention (m = 2.25), breastfeeding (m = 2.97), sleep (m = 2.83), the child's behaviour (m = 2.47) and the child's crying (m = 2.47). Also, parents rated suboptimal quality regarding that the care was based on healthcare routines rather than parental preferences and needs (m = 2.86). Parents born outside of the Nordic countries rated higher care quality than those born in the Nordic countries, as well as parents with a non‐academic education.ConclusionParents want information based on their preferences and needs. Parent's perceptions of areas for improvement are new and important knowledge for registered nurses at child health centres.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe findings indicate that parents feel that insufficient attention is given to areas of care that they perceive as important. Parents' perspectives on the care quality at child health centres is an important component of quality work and might lead to improvements in the care quality at child health centres.Reporting MethodThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used to guide reporting.Implications for policy and practiceThe findings of this study suggests that parents feel that insufficient attention is given to areas of care that they perceive as important. Parents' perspectives on the care quality at child health centres provides important knowledge which can guide further development of care quality at child health centres. The findings indicate that a family‐centred approach that integrates relational and routine‐oriented nursing can be a way to ensure that the care is based on parents' preferences and needs.No patient or public contribution.
AimTo examine parents' perceptions of care quality at child health centres. Specific objectives were to examine parents' perceptions of the care received and the subjective importance of such care. Furthermore, to examine the relationship between parents' sociodemographic characteristics and the perceptions of care quality.DesignA cross‐sectional study.MethodsA random sample of parents of children born in Sweden in 2021 participated. Data were collected by the QPP‐CHC questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics.ResultsThe response rate was 19.4%. The targeted sample size of 210 participants was reached as 584 parents responded to the questionnaire. Parents' overall ratings of care quality at child health centres indicated optimal quality with mean values >3. However, various potential improvements areas were identified as needing additional information. These included dental care (m = 2.82), allergy prevention (m = 2.25), breastfeeding (m = 2.97), sleep (m = 2.83), the child's behaviour (m = 2.47) and the child's crying (m = 2.47). Also, parents rated suboptimal quality regarding that the care was based on healthcare routines rather than parental preferences and needs (m = 2.86). Parents born outside of the Nordic countries rated higher care quality than those born in the Nordic countries, as well as parents with a non‐academic education.ConclusionParents want information based on their preferences and needs. Parent's perceptions of areas for improvement are new and important knowledge for registered nurses at child health centres.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe findings indicate that parents feel that insufficient attention is given to areas of care that they perceive as important. Parents' perspectives on the care quality at child health centres is an important component of quality work and might lead to improvements in the care quality at child health centres.Reporting MethodThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used to guide reporting.Implications for policy and practiceThe findings of this study suggests that parents feel that insufficient attention is given to areas of care that they perceive as important. Parents' perspectives on the care quality at child health centres provides important knowledge which can guide further development of care quality at child health centres. The findings indicate that a family‐centred approach that integrates relational and routine‐oriented nursing can be a way to ensure that the care is based on parents' preferences and needs.No patient or public contribution.
ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate parents’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) concerning the prevention and treatment of dust mite allergy in children.DesignThis cross-sectional study survey was conducted from September to December 2022 at Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated with China Medical University.ParticipantsA total of 503 parents of children with dust mite allergies participated, with 253 parents having children undergoing desensitisation treatment and 250 parents whose children did not. Selection criteria were carefully defined to include parents directly responsible for caring children with dust mite allergies.Primary and secondary outcome measuresTwo distinct questionnaires were administered to parents, tailored for those with and without children undergoing desensitisation treatment. These questionnaires covered demographic information, allergy diagnosis, treatment details and KAP related to dust mite allergy. Primary outcomes included parents’ scores on KAP regarding dust mite allergy prevention and treatment. Secondary outcomes involved analysing the interaction between these factors using pathway analysis.ResultsParents of children undergoing desensitisation treatment exhibited higher scores for all items of knowledge, attitude and overall practice than those without desensitisation therapy (all p values<0.05). The pathway analyses revealed that in the non-desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.22, p<0.001) and attitude directly affected practice (β=0.16, p<0.001), but the knowledge did not affect practice (β=−0.01, 0.06, p<0.001). In the desensitisation group, knowledge directly affected attitude (β=0.13, p=0.028), but the practice was not affected by attitude (β=0.08, p<0.001) or knowledge (β=0.03, 0.12, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe study highlighted differing levels of KAP among parents of children with dust mite allergies. The KAP was influenced by desensitisation therapy status. While attitudes tended to be favourable, practices were suboptimal, particularly among parents whose children did not receive desensitisation treatment. These findings emphasise the importance of targeted educational interventions to enhance parental awareness and practices regarding dust mite allergy management, especially in cases where desensitisation treatment is not pursued. Further research is warranted to explore effective strategies for improving parental engagement and adherence to preventive measures.
Background Allergic diseases are among the most common chronic diseases in childhood. Early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) behaviors of those caring for the infant during pregnancy and the first months of life may influence the risk of allergy development over the life course. Motivation and intention to use appropriate primary ECAP measures are thus of critical importance. Aims To characterize parental ECAP motivation, (a) valid indicators will be developed and (b) typical parental characteristics will be identified. (c) According to socio-cognitive models, the predictive value of parental risk perception, control belief and self-efficacy for parental ECAP motivation shall be determined. Method A sample of N = 343 (expectant) mothers of infants completed a questionnaire on self-reported ECAP motivation, risk perception, control belief, and self-efficacy. The cross-sectional data were analyzed using latent class analysis and structural equation modelling including nominal regression models. Results Four typical maternal response profiles (motivated to a customary degree, 70%; motivated to use primary preventive measures, 17.8%; reluctant towards new prevention measures, 6.4%; highly motivated to apply preventive measures in case of an existing allergy, 5.8%) could be identified for the items on ECAP motivation. After splitting the model variables “risk perception” (allergy vs. allergy-associated general health problems) and “self-efficacy” (trust vs. insecurity) a satisfactory model-fit was achieved (CFI = .939; RMSEA = .064). Particularly, increased “risk perception-allergy” (OR = 1.655) and “self-efficacy-insecurity” (OR = 2.013) as well as lower “risk perception-general health” (OR = 0.555) and “control belief” (OR = 0.217), respectively, are associated with higher ECAP motivation. Conclusion The use of ECAP-measures by parents to protect their newborns from allergies is important, but there are deficiencies in their implementation. Based on a social cognitive model approach, predictive characteristics could be identified, which are associated with increased motivation to implement ECAP-measures. For public health our findings provide a promising basis for conception of behavioral and environmental ECAP prevention measures and their motivated implementation by parents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.