How do parole board members in England and Wales construct decisions about whether to release perpetrators of intimate partner violence from prison?

Abstract

Background: Existing research explores Parole Board decision-making, but not specifically for perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV), a special case due to the gendered and secretive nature of IPV and the role of control in predicting reoffending. Aim: To identify associations between case variables in England and Wales Parole Board decisions regarding perpetrators of IPV and explore how these variables help construct the decision. Methods: Logistic regressions regarding decisions in a sample of all 137 male prisoners who had abused women and applied for release or progression to open conditions in England and Wales from April 2018 to September 2019, developed into latent class analyses. Thematic analyses of six interviews with Parole Board members about decision-making in IPV cases. Results: Release decisions were strongly predicted by the recommendations of offender managers, offender supervisors and psychologists, mediated by the Parole Board's confidence in their ability. Decisions were also significantly associated with custodial behaviour and attendance on courses, mediated by the Board's confidence in the prisoner's insight and honesty. Thematic analysis was both consistent with these findings and provided a context in which the associations could be understood.

Parole decisions about perpetrators of domestic violence in England and Wales

“…Survivors and practitioners in the field of domestic violence contributed to the interview guide and interviewees were paid for their time. The coding, detailed in an earlier publication (Dyke, Bird & Rivas, 2020), involved a ‘reflective’ thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2012) with three increasingly‐analytical rounds.…”

The importance of screening for speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) in police custody

“…Around 40% of adult offenders find it difficult or are unable to access and benefit from programmes which are verbally mediated, such as anger management, substance misuse or drug rehabilitation. The success of such interventions contributes to the reduction of reoffending risk (Bryan, 2004) and often are a requirement for consideration of release on licence (Dyke, Schucan Bird & Rivas, 2020).…”