2016
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1119274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do people respond to health news? The role of personality traits

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach to deepening our understanding of the neuroticism-health associations is to examine factors that influence the neuroticism-health associations. Some studies have found that conscientiousness moderates the associations between neuroticism and health, such that individuals who are high in neuroticism and also high in conscientiousness may experience more positive health outcomes compared to those who have high in neuroticism but low in conscientiousness (Turiano, Mroczek, Moynihan, & Chapman, 2013;Turiano, Whiteman, Hampson, Roberts, & Mroczek, 2012;Weston & Jackson, 2016). This combination of neuroticism and conscientiousness has thus been labeled "healthy neuroticism", though evidence that the combination of traits leads to better health or health behaviors is inconclusive (Graham et al, 2018;Weston, Hill, Edmonds, Mroczek, & Hampson, 2018).…”
Section: Neuroticism and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One approach to deepening our understanding of the neuroticism-health associations is to examine factors that influence the neuroticism-health associations. Some studies have found that conscientiousness moderates the associations between neuroticism and health, such that individuals who are high in neuroticism and also high in conscientiousness may experience more positive health outcomes compared to those who have high in neuroticism but low in conscientiousness (Turiano, Mroczek, Moynihan, & Chapman, 2013;Turiano, Whiteman, Hampson, Roberts, & Mroczek, 2012;Weston & Jackson, 2016). This combination of neuroticism and conscientiousness has thus been labeled "healthy neuroticism", though evidence that the combination of traits leads to better health or health behaviors is inconclusive (Graham et al, 2018;Weston, Hill, Edmonds, Mroczek, & Hampson, 2018).…”
Section: Neuroticism and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found direct links between personality and various health behaviors such as smoking (Graham et al, 2017;Turiano, Chapman, Gruenewald, & Mroczek, 2015), alcohol consumption (Hopwood, Baker, & Morey, 2008;Hopwood et al, 2007;Turiano et al, 2015), and physical activity (Graham et al, 2018). Additionally, research using mediator models provides evidence that health behaviors serve as mediators between personality and health outcomes (Graham et al, 2018;Turiano et al, 2013Turiano et al, , 2012Weston & Jackson, 2016). The behaviors an individual engages in may influence health, which influences an individual's life expectancy.…”
Section: Neuroticism and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroticism may also be associated with healthier behaviors. Individuals high in neuroticism report that they would be likely to engage in a number of adaptive behaviors, like research or seeking social support, after receiving bad health news (Weston & Jackson, 2016).…”
Section: Exploratory Analysis: Is the Relationship Between Neuroticism And Body Vigilance Dependent Upon Having Experienced A Major Healtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, the interaction is only present in three-way interactions, such as the interaction of conscientiousness, neuroticism, and gender to predict mortality risk in Friedman et al (2010), or in subsamples, such as only among individuals diagnosed with some chronic conditions in Weston and Jackson (2015). Moreover, a number of empirical studies show no relationship of this interaction to health behaviors (e.g., Atherton et al, 2014), adaptive responding to health news (Weston and Jackson, 2016), or more distal outcomes, such as frailty (Stephan et al, 2017). It is unclear whether these discrepant results are due to each of these analyses being underpowered to detect the interaction (McClelland and Judd, 1993), or if this interaction is only related to health among some populations or when measured using certain instruments, or if the true interaction effect is null and the published significant results are simply capturing spurious effects.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%