2002
DOI: 10.1080/02673030120105901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Places Matter? The Geography of Opportunity, Self-efficacy and a Look Inside the Black Box of Residential Mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These integrate housing and services to enhance social and economic well-being (Cohen et al, 2004). Other programmes have moved families into more prosperous neighbourhoods where respondents report psychological improvements such as an increased sense of self efficacy (Rosenbaum et al, 2002). Such services are yet to be widely developed in the UK although there is some evidence that provision such as Shelter's 'Homeless to Home' can help to sustain tenancies (Jones et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resettlementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These integrate housing and services to enhance social and economic well-being (Cohen et al, 2004). Other programmes have moved families into more prosperous neighbourhoods where respondents report psychological improvements such as an increased sense of self efficacy (Rosenbaum et al, 2002). Such services are yet to be widely developed in the UK although there is some evidence that provision such as Shelter's 'Homeless to Home' can help to sustain tenancies (Jones et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resettlementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies employing this approach have reached diametrically opposed conclusions, even within the same national context (cf. Rosenbaum et al, 2002;Briggs, 1997Briggs, , 1998Oreopolis, 2003;Edin et al, 2003;Aslund and Fredricksson, 2005). …”
Section: Selection/omitted Variables Bias and Measuring The Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the other two groups in the research, participants belonging to the experimental group indeed turned out to have a higher sense of self-efficacy (Rosenbaum et al 2002). Moreover, they came to live in better dwellings and safer neighbourhoods, but there is less evidence for the positive effects on their labour market position and level of education (Orr et al 2003).…”
Section: Mobility Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%