2018
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaa13f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do reference montage and electrodes setup affect the measured scalp EEG potentials?

Abstract: These results indicate that REST would be the first choice of re-reference and AR may be an alternative option for high level sensor noise case. Our findings may provide the helpful suggestions on how to obtain the EEG potentials as accurately as possible for cognitive neuroscientists and clinicians.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All further analyses were performed using EEGLAB, ERPLAB and/or the REST toolbox (Yao, 2001 ; Dong et al, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2018 ) in a MATLAB environment. For the gambling task, the ERP experimental effect was calculated by subtracting the gain condition (expected condition) from the loss condition (unexpected condition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All further analyses were performed using EEGLAB, ERPLAB and/or the REST toolbox (Yao, 2001 ; Dong et al, 2017 ; Hu et al, 2018 ) in a MATLAB environment. For the gambling task, the ERP experimental effect was calculated by subtracting the gain condition (expected condition) from the loss condition (unexpected condition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution of EEG is related to the number of electrodes used and their placement, or layout, on the scalp. The most utilized layout is the international 10-20 system, commonly consisting of 21 electrodes; higher density variants of the 10-20 system such as 10-10 and 10-5 systems are utilized as well, usually with 64 and 128 electrodes, respectively, [ 30 ] as well as the alternative layouts Maudsley [ 31 ] and Geodesics positioning systems [ 32 ]. In recent years, quantitative EEG (qEEG, henceforth simply EEG) has been proven to be a reliable clinical tool for the diagnosis and study of illnesses and cortical disorders such as Huntington disease [ 33 ], autism spectrum disorders [ 34 ], epilepsy and seizure [ 35 ], cerebral ischemia [ 36 ], frontotemporal dementia [ 37 ], and Parkinson's disease dementia [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, many studies have aimed to find a relatively non-active point on the body surface (Offner, 1950 ; Yao, 2001 ; Hagemann et al, 2001 ). Common online recording references include the FZ, CZ, PZ, OZ left/right earlobe, and nose (Andrew and Pfurtscheller, 1996 ; Bruder et al, 1997 ; Başar et al, 1998 ; Essl and Rappelsberger, 1998 ; Hu et al, 2018a ). Offline re-references mainly include the linked ears/mastoids (Garneski and Steelman, 1958 ), the common average reference (CAR; Offner, 1950 ), the reference electrode standardization technique (REST; Yao, 2001 ) and the unified referencing framework (rREST; Hu et al, 2018b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%