2019
DOI: 10.26199/acu.8vyq9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do school educators experience high-stakes testing? A case study of the Australian New South Wales Higher School Certificate in two independent schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this scrutiny strengthens the incentives for educators in low-scoring schools to adopt short-term strategies in an attempt to inflate test scores (Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009)-strategies such as targeting students at cutoff points (so-called "bubble kids"), reducing instructional differentiation, and narrowing the curriculum through teaching to the test and standard-specific remediation, to name a few (Amrein-Beardsley, 2022). Given these findings of disproportionately negative effects on schools with higher shares of low income and minority students, researchers have repeatedly raised concerns about the unintended consequences of test-based accountability policies (Baker & Johnston, 2010;Cahill, 2019;Cunningham & Sanzo, 2002;Herman & Golan, 1993;Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009;Polesel et al, 2012;Polesel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this scrutiny strengthens the incentives for educators in low-scoring schools to adopt short-term strategies in an attempt to inflate test scores (Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009)-strategies such as targeting students at cutoff points (so-called "bubble kids"), reducing instructional differentiation, and narrowing the curriculum through teaching to the test and standard-specific remediation, to name a few (Amrein-Beardsley, 2022). Given these findings of disproportionately negative effects on schools with higher shares of low income and minority students, researchers have repeatedly raised concerns about the unintended consequences of test-based accountability policies (Baker & Johnston, 2010;Cahill, 2019;Cunningham & Sanzo, 2002;Herman & Golan, 1993;Mintrop & Sunderman, 2009;Polesel et al, 2012;Polesel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%