2020
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy

Abstract: Vocabulary size seems to be affected by multiple factors, including those that belong to the properties of the words themselves and those that relate to the characteristics of the individuals assessing the words. In this study, we present results from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy in which more than 150,000 native speakers from around 20 Spanish-speaking countries performed a lexical decision task to 70 target word items selected from a list of about 45,000 Spanish words. We examined how demographi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
24
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
7
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, many of these words are likely to be cognates of words in their L1 or even in another L2. Keuleers, Brysbaert, Stevens, and Mandera (2015) pointed out that the same type of indirect vocabulary likely explains why Dutch speakers’ L1 vocabulary increases with the number of L2s known (for a similar finding with Spanish L1 speakers, see also Aguasvivas et al., 2020). More in general, this suggests that a part of a multilingual’s vocabulary can be considered as being ‘pan-language’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, many of these words are likely to be cognates of words in their L1 or even in another L2. Keuleers, Brysbaert, Stevens, and Mandera (2015) pointed out that the same type of indirect vocabulary likely explains why Dutch speakers’ L1 vocabulary increases with the number of L2s known (for a similar finding with Spanish L1 speakers, see also Aguasvivas et al., 2020). More in general, this suggests that a part of a multilingual’s vocabulary can be considered as being ‘pan-language’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, the vocabulary size used in the present modeling work represents an almost ten-fold input size increase from previously reported models, containing around 1,700 words at most (Li & Grant, 2019). Our choice of vocabulary aligns with a real-world scenario considering that the average young adult controls more than 25,000 words (Aguasvivas et al, 2020;Brysbaert et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Empirical evidence from a Spanish lexical decision megastudy suggests that monolingual and bilingual participants do not differ in their LDT accuracy (Aguasvivas et al, 2020). Therefore, the different versions and runs of the CLOUD models needed to have comparable performance on this adapted Spanish LDT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of recruiting participants from heterogeneous groups using a crowdsourcing method, concerns have been raised that the participants will be easily distracted and the data quality may be poor (Woods et al, 2015 ). However, recent web-based crowdsourced experiments have successfully replicated standard lexical processing effects, as long as outliers are removed and other data-quality practices are adopted (Aguasvivas et al, 2020 ; Mandera et al, 2020 ). This all suggests that reliable data can be obtained using less-controlled web-based platforms, and further studies should be conducted using this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%