2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in relation to its social nature? A survey study in Flanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Students' beliefs about the helpfulness of peer feedback were found to be positively associated with (self-reported) self-regulation and negatively associated with GPA (Brown et al 2016). Similarly, students' beliefs about the usefulness of peer feedback were found to be positively associated with perceived peer-feedback accuracy and trust in one-self as a provider and in the peer as a recipient (Rotsaert et al 2017).…”
Section: Students' Beliefs About Peer Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Students' beliefs about the helpfulness of peer feedback were found to be positively associated with (self-reported) self-regulation and negatively associated with GPA (Brown et al 2016). Similarly, students' beliefs about the usefulness of peer feedback were found to be positively associated with perceived peer-feedback accuracy and trust in one-self as a provider and in the peer as a recipient (Rotsaert et al 2017).…”
Section: Students' Beliefs About Peer Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A recent study revealed that students' beliefs about the helpfulness of peer feedback positively predicted self-regulation and negatively predicted grade point average (Brown, Peterson & Yao, 2016). Similarly, Rotsaert, Panadero, Estrada and Schellens (2017) found that beliefs about the usefulness of peer feedback were positively associated with perceived accuracy and trust in themselves as a provider and in their peers as a recipient. It is still unclear, however, whether the same relationship can be found if the accuracy of the peer feedback comments is measured instead of general beliefs regarding the accuracy of peer feedback, and to what extent peer feedback providers' perceptions of their own peer feedback message match the accuracy of their peer feedback.…”
Section: The Role Of Beliefs and Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…RQ2: What is the relationship between peer feedback accuracy and peer feedback providers' beliefs about peer feedback provision, their perceptions of their peer feedback message, and their experienced anxiety, curiosity and confusion? H2a: Based on the findings by Rotsaert et al (2017) and research on epistemological and selfcontrol beliefs (Zimmerman et al, 1992;Muis, 2004), we hypothesized that peer feedback providers' beliefs about peer feedback provision and their perceptions of their peer feedback message would be positively related to peer feedback accuracy (Figure 1). H2b: Since curiosity is positively associated with shallow and deep processing during mathematics problem solving, confusion is negatively associated with it (Muis et al, 2015), and anxiety is negatively related to performance on complex tasks (Pekrun, 2011), we hypothesized that peer feedback accuracy would be positively related to curiosity and negatively related to confusion and anxiety (Figure 1).…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total number of seven studies focused on PA whereas only one focused on SA (see Table 3). Two studies were surveys on students' perceptions of PA (Rotsaert et al 2017) and teachers' perceptions of PA (Rotsaert, Panadero, and Schellens 2018). One study used a qualitative approach to study the implementation of PA in teaching the speaking skill (Musfirah 2019).…”
Section: Peer Assessment (Pa) and Self-assessment (Sa)mentioning
confidence: 99%