How do supply- and demand-side interventions influence equity in healthcare utilisation? Evidence from maternal healthcare in Senegal

Abstract

The launch of the Millennium Development Goals in 2000, followed by the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, and the increasing focus on achieving universal health coverage has led to numerous interventions on both supply-and demand-sides of health systems in low-and middle-income countries. While tremendous progress has been achieved, inequities in access to healthcare persist, leading to calls for a closer examination of the equity implications of these interventions. This paper examines the equity implications of two such interventions in the context of maternal healthcare in Senegal. The first intervention on the supply-side focuses on improving the availability of maternal health services while the second intervention, on the demand-side, abolished user fees for facility deliveries. Using three rounds of Demographic Health Surveys covering the period 1992 to 2010 and employing three measures of socioeconomic status (SES) based on household wealth, mothers' education and rural/urban residencewe find that although both interventions increase utilisation of maternal health services, the rich benefit more from the supply-side intervention, thereby increasing inequity, while the poor benefit more from the demand-side intervention i.e. reducing inequity. Both interventions positively influence facility deliveries in rural areas although the increase in facility deliveries after the demand-side intervention is more than the increase after the supply-side intervention. There is no significant difference in utilisation based on mothers' education. Since people from different SES categories are likely to respond differently to interventions on the supply-and demand-side of the health system, policymakers involved in the design of health programmes should pay closer attention to concerns of inequity and elite capture that may unintentionally result from these interventions.

How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal

“…Furthermore, during implementation, UHC policies should be closely monitored since they may have unexpected effects on equity. For instance, a recent study on maternal healthcare in Senegal shows that while a demand-side intervention (abolition of user fees) benefitted the poorer households more, thereby reducing inequity, a supply-side intervention (expansion of the availability of maternal health services) benefitted the richer households more, thereby increasing inequity [67].…”

Can a National Health Insurance Policy Increase Equity in the Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendants in Indonesia? A Secondary Analysis of the 2012 to 2016 National Socio-Economic Survey of Indonesia

“…A study in Bangladesh using DHS (Demographic and Health Survey) data in 2001 and 2010 presented an increasing percentage of antenatal care in urban (60% to 68%) and rural areas (37% to 49%). The research by Parmar and Banerjee 16 in Senegal and De La Torre et al 17 in Brazil and Colombia indicated that there was a gap in maternal health services utilization. A systematic review conducted by Çalışkan et al 18 confirmed that the earlier studies were dominated by the discussions of health services utilization; yet, they ignored the equity problems.…”

Over-utilisation of maternity in a tertiary referral hospital in Cambodia – a descriptive study with implications for equity in access to health services and official development assistance

“…Another study in Senegal shows that a mere intervention on the supply side increased inequity between the rich and poor [25]. The grant aid in this study is a typical example of supply side intervention.…”