How Do the Different Types of Land Costs Affect Agricultural Crop-Planting Selections in China?

Abstract

Land costs in agricultural production are rapidly becoming apparent and increasing in light of the market’s rapid development in rural China. This study examines how agricultural operators’ farming decisions are affected by explicit and implicit costs associated with land transfers. This study first categorizes explicit and implicit land costs theoretically and demonstrates that both types of land costs affect farmers’ crop-planting selections. The study then uses the most recent household survey data from the Chinese Family Database (CFD) and the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), released in 2017, to empirically test the theoretical analysis and examine the mechanisms underlying the impact of land costs on crop-planting selections. This study makes the case that higher land costs, both explicit and implicit, cause agricultural operators to grow more crops for cash and less for food. The impact of land costs on planting selection can vary depending on the heterogeneity of production areas and geography. In terms of production area heterogeneity, the explicit cost of land has a greater influence on planting decisions in non-major food-producing areas, whereas the implicit cost of land has a greater influence on planting decisions in major food-producing areas. In terms of topographic heterogeneity, the less flat the terrain, the more growers would choose to grow cash crops. A complementary relationship between the two forms of costs is also suggested by this study’s confirmation that explicit and implicit land costs can positively reduce each other’s impact on cropping decisions. Additional mechanism research revealed that explicit and implicit land costs impact crop crop-planting selections. The explicit cost of land primarily affects the local land transfer market effect, whereas the implicit cost of land affects the land transfer service.

Factors Influencing the Chance of Inheriting the Family Farming Career among Heirs in the Upper Northern Region of Thailand in the Crisis of Farming Labor Decline

“…This is to say, owning more pieces of arable land in the rural area can secure the farming careers of heirs. In addition to this advantage, having a variety of mixed farming products and activities, such as various kinds of plants and vegetables, livestock farming, or fisheries, increases the chance of inheriting the farming career, ensures the sustenance of farming in the long term, and secures the economy through several income sources, similar to the findings in [31,32]. All these noteworthy points may create the possibility for an heir to choose the faming career, as determined by the will of the parents, in order to continuously secure their income through various sources.…”

“…Having a positive attitude towards the farming career can clearly strengthen the survival of family farms [4]. The reports of the International Fund for Agricultural Development [29] and the study reported in [30][31][32] reached the same conclusion, stating that the family's land size is one of the most important factors necessary to sustain the succession of family farming. Having a section of arable land in a rural area can encourage the continuation of farming activities [33][34][35][36].…”

The Impact of Land Transfer-In on Crop Planting Structure and Its Heterogeneity among Farmers: Evidence from China

“…There are many explanations for this conclusion, but the most critical crux is the high cost of land transfer, and the root cause is the low comparative returns of grain crops [60]. According to the data of the National Compilation of Costs and Benefits of Agricultural Products [61], from 2003 to 2020, the average land rent of the three main grain crops (paddy, wheat, and maize) in China increased from 56.1 CNY/hectare to 660.15 CNY/hectare, an increase of 10.8 times.…”

Will the Structure of Food Imports Improve China’s Water-Intensive Food Cultivation Structure? A Spatial Econometric Analysis

“…The domestic water resources saved by the SEFI can produce fewer low-water-use food crops. Therefore, the SEFI has a less negative impact on the proportion of WFC in non-major food-producing areas than in major ones [31]. Table 6.…”