2004
DOI: 10.5465/20159634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do They Get There? An Examination of the Antecedents of Centrality in Team Networks

Abstract: Drawing on social exchange and similarity-attraction theories, we hypothesized that individuals' demographic characteristics, values, and personality influence their acquisition of central positions in their teams' social networks. Education and neuroticism predicted centrality five months later; individuals who were highly educated and low in neuroticism became high in advice and friendship centrality and low in adversarial centrality. Team members' values similarity to their teammates also predicted advice a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
244
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
15
244
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, individual differences in personality can shape network structures, with highly neurotic people (who typically exhibit high negative affect) exhibiting lower centrality in networks (Klein et al, 2004), and lonely people finding themselves on the periphery of social networks (Cacioppo et al, 2009). Such research implies that the association between individual characteristics and network structures arise when affect leads to repulsion or attraction responses in others (Casciaro and Lobo, 2008), feedback which in turn could lead people to further withdraw from or engage with their networks (Derfler-Rozin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Affect and Cognitive Social Network Activationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, individual differences in personality can shape network structures, with highly neurotic people (who typically exhibit high negative affect) exhibiting lower centrality in networks (Klein et al, 2004), and lonely people finding themselves on the periphery of social networks (Cacioppo et al, 2009). Such research implies that the association between individual characteristics and network structures arise when affect leads to repulsion or attraction responses in others (Casciaro and Lobo, 2008), feedback which in turn could lead people to further withdraw from or engage with their networks (Derfler-Rozin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Affect and Cognitive Social Network Activationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Brass, 1984;Brass and Burkhardt, 1992), as well as reflecting how closely an individual 'belongs' to a virtual group (Ahuja et al, 2003). An actor's central 'location' within a social network has significant consequences (see for example, Klein et al, 2004;Sparrowe et al, 2001), in the same way as the centrality of a network node can be a measure of its structural importance e among other attributes, such actors are in an advantageous position to control and monitor flows of information (Brass and Krackhardt, 1999;Shaw, 1964).…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kalish and Robins (2006) find effects for both extraversion and emotional stability on the structure and closeness of networks. Klein et al (2004) examine how personality traits influence the role people play in their social networks. They find that individuals who are high in emotional stability are more likely to occupy a central role in their networks.…”
Section: Psychological Predispositions and Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%