2011
DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do we know when research from one setting can be useful in another? A review of external validity, applicability and transferability frameworks

Abstract: A validated framework of applicability and transferability would help those aiming to encourage research use, as well as those conducting research. Greater understanding of applicability and transferability could help to encourage the appropriate use of research and the development of research that is more useful.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the theoretical basis and process for translating effective interventions according to cultural or national differences is not fully understood, there is a growing literature on this topic. For example, models have been developed for examining applicability of public health evidence across contexts (e.g., Bonell, Oakley, Hargreaves, Strange, & Rees, 2006;Burchett, Umoquit, & Dobrow, 2011;Wang, Moss, & Hiller, 2006), and frameworks, derived from mental health and prevention literature, to guide translation and adaptation (Barrera & Castro, 2006;Ferrer-Wreder, Sundell, & Mansoory, 2012;Kumpfer, Pinyuchon, de Melo, & Whiteside, 2008;Sussman, Unger, & Palinkas, 2008). Moreover, there is a growing body of literature-though no systematic review-on factors affecting whether transportation is likely to be appropriate or successful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theoretical basis and process for translating effective interventions according to cultural or national differences is not fully understood, there is a growing literature on this topic. For example, models have been developed for examining applicability of public health evidence across contexts (e.g., Bonell, Oakley, Hargreaves, Strange, & Rees, 2006;Burchett, Umoquit, & Dobrow, 2011;Wang, Moss, & Hiller, 2006), and frameworks, derived from mental health and prevention literature, to guide translation and adaptation (Barrera & Castro, 2006;Ferrer-Wreder, Sundell, & Mansoory, 2012;Kumpfer, Pinyuchon, de Melo, & Whiteside, 2008;Sussman, Unger, & Palinkas, 2008). Moreover, there is a growing body of literature-though no systematic review-on factors affecting whether transportation is likely to be appropriate or successful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some published assessment tools that can be used to assess the external validity of research studies are available (Burchett, Umoquit, Dobrow, 2011, andDyrvig et al, 2014). However, in most cases, this validity assessment has to be determined by the review team, and tailored toward the review questions.…”
Section: External Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La generalizabilidad, concepto según el cual los resultados de un estudio puedan ser generalizados a un contexto más amplio, es uno de los retos de la ISSS (5). Pero, precisamente, como los resultados de estas investigaciones dependen del contexto particular donde se realizan, esto dificulta su generalización más allá del lugar y del sistema de salud estudiado.…”
Section: Retos Vinculados a La Complejidad De Los Sistemas De Saludunclassified