2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“How do we rally around the one who was positive?” Familial uncertainty management in the context of men managing BRCA-related cancer risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response to cascade screening was higher for female than for male index participants, indicating the need for improved communication with gender-specific heritable disorders. 38,39 The contacting of family members for cascade screening is one way to maximize the impact of a population biobank, and further investigation is needed to determine the best way to increase response rates for optimization of this cascade approach.…”
Section: Potential Of Existing Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response to cascade screening was higher for female than for male index participants, indicating the need for improved communication with gender-specific heritable disorders. 38,39 The contacting of family members for cascade screening is one way to maximize the impact of a population biobank, and further investigation is needed to determine the best way to increase response rates for optimization of this cascade approach.…”
Section: Potential Of Existing Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some men, concern for the health of existing or potential daughters or granddaughters is a key motivation for seeking BRCA testing 2930. In contrast, sometimes men are reluctant to have BRCA testing because they are concerned about potentially having passed a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant on to their children.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through such counseling, practitioners can advise female family members to make at-risk men the subject of the narrative at times to help men better recognize their risks. Receiving this genetic risk information from a trusted family member might enhance the likelihood that the men engage in information seeking about BRCA-related cancer risks, genetic counseling, and testing, and ultimately employ proactive decision-making (Rauscher et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%