2021
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1121-21.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do You Feel the Rhythm: Dynamic Motor-Auditory Interactions Are Involved in the Imagination of Hierarchical Timing

Abstract: Predicting and organizing patterns of events is important for humans to survive in a dynamically changing world. The motor system has been proposed to be actively, and necessarily, engaged in not only the production but the perception of rhythm by organizing hierarchical timing that influences auditory responses. It is not yet well understood how the motor system interacts with the auditory system to perceive and maintain hierarchical structure in time. This study investigated the dynamic interaction between a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motor cortico-striatal circuit is part of a core timing network, along with prefrontal and cerebellar regions (Coull et al, 2011;Matell & F I G U R E 3 Correlation between severity of PD-related motor symptoms (UPDRS) and contrast estimates (medium À (low + high)/2) from the effect of rhythmic complexity on pleasure. Meck, 2004;Teghil et al, 2019) and is implicated in relative or beat-based timing in particular (Bengtsson et al, 2009;Breska & Ivry, 2018;Chen et al, 2008;Cheng et al, 2022;Cope et al, 2014;Grahn & Rowe, 2009Kasdan et al, 2022;Kung et al, 2013;Merchant et al, 2015;Schubotz et al, 2000;Teki et al, 2012;Thaut et al, 2008). This is consistent with a role of the motor system in driving temporal predictions in the context of auditory perception and attention more generally (Arnal, 2012;Morillon et al, 2015;Nobre & van Ede, 2018;Rimmele et al, 2018;Schubotz, 2007).…”
Section: Rhythmic Complexitysupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motor cortico-striatal circuit is part of a core timing network, along with prefrontal and cerebellar regions (Coull et al, 2011;Matell & F I G U R E 3 Correlation between severity of PD-related motor symptoms (UPDRS) and contrast estimates (medium À (low + high)/2) from the effect of rhythmic complexity on pleasure. Meck, 2004;Teghil et al, 2019) and is implicated in relative or beat-based timing in particular (Bengtsson et al, 2009;Breska & Ivry, 2018;Chen et al, 2008;Cheng et al, 2022;Cope et al, 2014;Grahn & Rowe, 2009Kasdan et al, 2022;Kung et al, 2013;Merchant et al, 2015;Schubotz et al, 2000;Teki et al, 2012;Thaut et al, 2008). This is consistent with a role of the motor system in driving temporal predictions in the context of auditory perception and attention more generally (Arnal, 2012;Morillon et al, 2015;Nobre & van Ede, 2018;Rimmele et al, 2018;Schubotz, 2007).…”
Section: Rhythmic Complexitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The flattened response to rhythmic complexity in PD supports a role of dopamine in the effects of rhythm on both the urge to move and pleasure. The motor cortico‐striatal circuit is part of a core timing network, along with prefrontal and cerebellar regions (Coull et al, 2011; Matell & Meck, 2004; Teghil et al, 2019) and is implicated in relative or beat‐based timing in particular (Bengtsson et al, 2009; Breska & Ivry, 2018; Chen et al, 2008; Cheng et al, 2022; Cope et al, 2014; Grahn & Rowe, 2009, 2013; Kasdan et al, 2022; Kung et al, 2013; Merchant et al, 2015; Schubotz et al, 2000; Teki et al, 2012; Thaut et al, 2008). This is consistent with a role of the motor system in driving temporal predictions in the context of auditory perception and attention more generally (Arnal, 2012; Morillon et al, 2015; Nobre & van Ede, 2018; Rimmele et al, 2018; Schubotz, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If music serves as an auditory cue for coordinating group behaviors, predictable temporal regularity at the optimal rate for human movements and audiomotor synchronization (1-2 Hz; MacDougall & Moore, 2005;Van Der Wel et al, 2009;Repp & Su, 2013) would be important. And in fact, motor brain networks are activated while processing musical rhythms and isochronous tone sequences (e.g., Cannon & Patel, 2021;Chang et al, 2019Cheng et al, 2022;Fujioka et al, 2012Fujioka et al, , 2015Levitin et al, 2018;Phillips-Silver & Trainor, 2005;Kotz et al, 2018;Morillon & Baillet, 2017). The AM rate of speech, analogously, has been attributed to the neurophysiological properties of the specialized auditory-motor oscillatory network for speech perception and production, as well as the associated biomechanics of the articulatory movements (Assaneo and Poeppel, 2018;Assaneo et al, 2021;Giraud & Poeppel, 2012;Poeppel & Assaneo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flattened response to rhythmic complexity in PD patients supports a role of cortico-striatal dopamine in the effects of rhythm on both the urge to move and pleasure. The motor cortico-striatal loop is part of a core timing network, along with prefrontal and cerebellar regions [94][95][96] , and is implicated in in relative or beat-based timing in particular [9][10][11][12][13][14]56,[97][98][99][100][101][102] . This is consistent with a role of the motor system in driving temporal predictions in the context of auditory perception and attention more generally [103][104][105][106][107] .…”
Section: Rhythmic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%