How do you make a classroom operate like a work of art? Deleuzeguattarian methodologies of research-creation

Springgay, Stephanie; Rotas, Nikki

doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.933913

Cited by 32 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…How can we feel out how algorithms get their "hooks in the flesh" (Massumi, 2015, p. 85), working on and with our senses and activating our bodies in different ways? We are certainly not alone in being concerned about affect and method, and follow in the steps of a vibrant body of postqualitative research theorizing and experimenting with posthuman affect and method (see, for example, Coleman & Ringrose, 2013;Cvetkovich, 2012;Gershon, 2013;Hickey-Moody, 2012Hillis et al, 2015;Ivinson & Renold, 2013;Jackson & Mazzei, 2012;Johansson, 2015;Juelskjaer, Staunaes, & Ratner, 2013;Knudsen & Stage, 2015;Lather & St. Pierre, 2013;Leander & Boldt, 2013;Lenz Taguchi, 2016;MacLure, 2013;Renold, 2017;Renold & Ivinson, 2014;Ringrose, 2010Ringrose, , 2013Rotas, 2014;Springgay, 2011;Springgay & Rotas, 2015;Springgay & Zaliwska, 2016;St. Pierre, 2011;Thiel, 2015;Vannini, 2015; among many others).…”

Section: Methods Of the Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algorithmic Noise: Ed Reform 2.0 and Work/Think/Playing With Methods of the Present

Niccolini

Lesko

2017

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As we become more and more algorithmic subjects, algorithms shape the news we access, our political and social views, how and what we buy, as well as the emotional tenor of our lives. Tracking how algorithms work on and with our senses and activate our bodies in different ways requires experimental approaches. To explore affect, algorithms, and method, we work/think/play via two reassemblages of algorithmic tools borrowed from the corporate and art worlds: Moodlens and the Listening Machine. Our algorithmic play with educational reformers’ images and tweets suggests a strategy for fattening our methods and theories to respond to ever-increasing data flows and thinking additively, fractally, and exponentially.

show abstract

Section: Methods Of the Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algorithmic Noise: Ed Reform 2.0 and Work/Think/Playing With Methods of the Present

Niccolini

Lesko

2017

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We do this by working in an alternative paradigm, the ethico-aesthetic. Following, Rolnik (2017), but also Guattari (1995), Braidotti (2006) and scholars in curriculum studies (Springgay and Rotas 2015), early childhood studies (Dahlberg 2016;Hackett 2017;MacRae 2019;Trafí-Prats 2018, and environmental education (Rousell and Cutter-McKenzie-Knowles 2018), we understand an ethico-aesthetic paradigm as one that engages in sensuous and affirmative becomings with bodies, materials and technologies that endanger the perpetuation of neoliberalized parenting by generating embryos of other possible parental worlds (Rolnik 2017). We follow Guattari (2000) in considering that parental ecologies could be transformed through new aesthetic and analytic practices that intensify sense and affect.…”

Section: Towards An Ethico-aesthetic Paradigm Of Parentingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards an Ethico-Aesthetic of Parenting: Sensing Ritornellos of Play with GoPro Data

Trafí-Prats

Caton

2020

Genealogy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues for an ethico-aesthetic approach to parenting as an alternative to the neoliberalisation of parenting, and its critiques. This ethico-aesthetic approach focuses on affect and the intensification of collective life. In the article, it is explored in connection to a group of parents and children under six who participated in a play event called Moving with lines and light. As parents, researchers and players who participated in this play event, the authors think together with fragments of GoPro data and the concept of the ritornello. They do this as an exercise in sensing the non-linear time of parenting in/with the play through a prolonged, active and relational process of recollection and narration that combines analogic and technologic events. With these, the authors discuss the parenting body in postdevelopmental modes of existence organized around sense, territory and technicity that propel a thinking of parenting beyond practices of symbolic control, and as living ecologies of action.

show abstract

“…As another form of response-ability, feminist posthuman and new materialist research practices question traditional methodologies-which tend to be grounded in the logics of rationality and transcendence-and actively seek different ways of researching that attend to more-than-human world(ing) relations, experiment with different modes of creative expression beyond the textual, and produce situated forms of knowledge that respond to urgent ethico-political imperatives (Taylor & Hughes, 2016;Renold, 2018Renold, , 2019Niccolini andRingrose, 2019, Renold &. From a PhEmaterialist perspective, researching is a creative, experimental endeavor-acts of researchcreation (e.g., Springgay & Rotas, 2015), edu-crafting (Taylor & Hughes, 2016), performing methodology (Otterstad, 2018), and/or knowledge-production (Braidotti, 2019a).…”

Section: Medusa Risingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial

Osgood¹,

Strom²,

Ringrose³

et al. 2019

RERM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Special Issue offers PhEmaterialisms as a way to explore the world as vital and complex, while simultaneously being response-able to the multiple ethical imperatives of late-stage capitalism. We argue that PhEmaterialist thinking and practices can help us grapple with growing educational complexities, enabling strategies to resist and create alternatives to the patterns of injustice occurring across the world, from burgeoning ethno-nationalist and neo-fascist political movements, to rising global poverty levels, to massive population displacements, to environmental degradation, to toxic internet movements grounded in misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia (Strom & Martin, 2017a).

show abstract

How do you make a classroom operate like a work of art? Deleuzeguattarian methodologies of research-creation

Cited by 32 publications

References 26 publications

Algorithmic Noise: Ed Reform 2.0 and Work/Think/Playing With Methods of the Present

Algorithmic Noise: Ed Reform 2.0 and Work/Think/Playing With Methods of the Present

Towards an Ethico-Aesthetic of Parenting: Sensing Ritornellos of Play with GoPro Data

Editorial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About