How does a local initiative contribute to social inclusion and promote sustainable food practices? Focus on the example of social cooking workshops

Abstract

Initiatives from food system players closer to citizens are currently valorized to promote sustainability. Based on TCR and on the practice theories, this research aims at studying the impacts of a local initiative on two aspects: social inclusion and sustainable food practices. To do so, we chose the example of cooking classes for people in social instability. Cooking classes may contribute to fight against social exclusion through two factors: first the group dynamic and then the value-creation for participants. Besides, cooking classes may drive towards sustainable food practices on the basis of advice about new skills. Cooking classes in three different social service structures were observed: a Social Centre; a social service structure hosting young people suffering from homophobia; and, a hosting centre for people with disabilities. To complete these observations, semi-directive one-hour interviews were conducted with three participants from the different groups. This information was analyzed with thematic analysis and practice theories tools. Results show that the main factor of social inclusion is the value-creation, with two factors contributing to people's self-esteem: (re)teach them how to cook; and offer them the opportunity to cook and eat good food. The cooking classes are efficient to promote sustainable food practices, promoting at the same time the interest in shared-eating, shared-cooking, and new skills. Nevertheless, it is not enough for the people to adopt new practices because of material and logistical barriers. As such, our findings are important for policy makers tasked with promoting sustainable consumption and social insertion within vulnerable population

Household Food Waste—How to Avoid It? An Integrative Review

“…In particular, the instructions focus on increasing skills and knowledge sets that enable people to reduce waste levels while also acting upon their other food-related aims (Stöckli et al 2018). Such interventions can provide tips and tricks on how to plan a meal (Romani et al 2018;Schmidt 2016), prolong shelf life, increase inventory overview, estimate food safety (Hebrok and Boks 2017;Terpstra et al 2005) or cook creatively (Dyen and Sirieix 2016;Närvänen et al 2018). Providing instruction has shown to be successful when used in isolation (Romani et al 2018), but more effective when combined with other interventions, such as commitment and prompts (Osbaldiston and Schott 2012;Schmidt 2016).…”

Food insecurity, food waste, food behaviours and cooking confidence of UK citizens at the start of the COVID-19 lockdown

“…Cooking interventions which improve cooking skills and confidence have been shown to have a positive impact on consumption of healthy diets (Sprake et al , 2018), consumers with high levels of cooking skills are less likely to consume moderately or highly processed foods (Brunner et al , 2010). In addition, improving cooking skills has also been reported to reduce food waste (Dyen and Sirieix, 2016).…”

Moving towards ecologically sustainable diets: Lessons from an Italian box delivery scheme

“…Evidence from the work of social anthropologists shows that the complex reality of the respondents’ lives does not always allow them to live up to their intentions and values (Dixon & Isaacs, ; Dyen & Sirieix, ; Evans, ; Jackson, ). Respondents are still, in spite of their disaffection with supermarkets, embedded in a consumerist culture made up of loyalty to brands, the desire for choice and the orthodox notion of being a “good, or savvy, consumer” (Evans, , p. 113; Dubuisson‐Quellier et al, ).…”