2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does adaptive consumer movement affect population dynamics in consumer–resource metacommunities with homogeneous patches?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous models of one species population performing fitness-dependent dispersal, population asynchrony is viewed as a stabilizing factor that reduces total population fluctuation (e.g. [31], [32]). However, our results suggest that asynchrony in consumer population sizes is coupled with asynchrony in resource levels (as in [31], [32]), which could make the system more susceptible to the invasion of adaptive disperser.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous models of one species population performing fitness-dependent dispersal, population asynchrony is viewed as a stabilizing factor that reduces total population fluctuation (e.g. [31], [32]). However, our results suggest that asynchrony in consumer population sizes is coupled with asynchrony in resource levels (as in [31], [32]), which could make the system more susceptible to the invasion of adaptive disperser.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of competition, density-dependent dispersal is also used to explain coexistence pattern [28], and it realizes the spatially segregated distribution of populations, which, promotes coexistence of directly-competing species whose competition outcomes are otherwise determined by priority effect [29]. Directed dispersal based on fitness differences between patches are also studied in the single species context, and theoretical studies show that this fitness-dependent dispersal can affect resource distribution [30] and stabilize total population size by creating asynchrony of population sizes and resource levels among patches [31], [32]. Fitness-dependent dispersal is also known to affect species interaction with its predator [33], [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 We limit the density-dependent response of prey to predation risk rather than to their total fitness. 3 Specifically, densitydependent dispersal is proportional to the per capita (of prey) predation rate. It increases as the density of predators increases but decreases as the density of prey increases since the individual predation risk decreases.…”
Section: A the Ecological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we highlight the role of non-consumptive effects of predation on synchrony through predator avoidance, our results also contribute to the integration between theories of metacommunities and of trait-mediated indirect interactions. 3,33 Finally, the importance of landscape feature for movement of organisms has been investigated through habitat fragmentation and corridors, which are often assumed to affect the rate of movement between habitats in theoretical studies. Our analysis shows that the temporal scales of movements driven by both landscape properties and behavior are key for explaining the maintenance of heterogeneity across weakly connected communities.…”
Section: A Interactions Between Time To Movement and Travel Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following earlier work on adaptive consumer foraging, parameter values are chosen to generate cyclic population dynamics in the absence of consumer adaptation and environmental stochasticity (e.g., Abrams and Ruokolainen, 2011;Rooney et al, 2006;Vasseur and Fox, 2007). We set r i ¼0.65, k i ¼ 1, b¼0.25, I i ¼ 0.65, B 0 ¼ 0.15, e¼ 0.5, and d ¼0.1.…”
Section: Food Web Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%