2018
DOI: 10.21061/jcte.v32i1.1589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Applied STEM Coursework Relate to Mathematics and Science Self-Efficacy Among High School Students? Evidence from a National Sample.

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the quantity of CTE offerings, researchers concluded that access to work-based internships and apprenticeships is distributed inequitably across students (Cox et al, 2015;Evan et al, 2013;Fletcher & Cox, 2012). In addition, CTE program offerings need to be better aligned with the labor market so that they connect students with higher paying jobs (Sublett & Griffith, 2019) and match employer demand (Mezera & Suffren, 2018). Furthermore, an emerging trend of CTE programs relies solely on GPA and test scores for admissions, and this trend serves as a barrier to access for underrepresented groups (Gerwetz, 2017).…”
Section: The Extent To Which Students From Historically Marginalized Groups Receive Equal Treatment With Respect To the Quality And Quantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to the quantity of CTE offerings, researchers concluded that access to work-based internships and apprenticeships is distributed inequitably across students (Cox et al, 2015;Evan et al, 2013;Fletcher & Cox, 2012). In addition, CTE program offerings need to be better aligned with the labor market so that they connect students with higher paying jobs (Sublett & Griffith, 2019) and match employer demand (Mezera & Suffren, 2018). Furthermore, an emerging trend of CTE programs relies solely on GPA and test scores for admissions, and this trend serves as a barrier to access for underrepresented groups (Gerwetz, 2017).…”
Section: The Extent To Which Students From Historically Marginalized Groups Receive Equal Treatment With Respect To the Quality And Quantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feelings of self-efficacy in math and science may also be directly related to self-efficacy in career decision-making (Austin, 2010). Sublett and Plasman (2018) examined disaggregated outcomes with respect to social and emotional outcomes, finding that applied STEM coursework led to both math and science self-efficacy-except for girls and students with disabilities. An MDRC report argued there are additional equity concerns at the intersection of social and emotional outcomes and CTE as underfunded schools are less able to provide students with mentoring or training in soft skills (Rosen & Molina, 2019).…”
Section: Equal Educational Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on educational climates and applied STEM coursework also support the benefits of active over passive learning environments (McNeil, 2000;Thapa et al, 2012;Sublett, and Plasman, 2017). Educational climate research emphasizes that students experience superior short-term and long-term outcomes when embedded in supportive, cooperative, and respectful educational environments, where students are encouraged to actively participate in the learning process (Thapa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational climate research emphasizes that students experience superior short-term and long-term outcomes when embedded in supportive, cooperative, and respectful educational environments, where students are encouraged to actively participate in the learning process (Thapa et al, 2012). Research on applied STEM courses highlight how hands-on learning opportunities help contextualize more abstract STEM concepts in real-world settings, which promote academic engagement and reduces anxiety (Bozick et al, 2014;Sublett, and Plasman, 2017). Finally, a meta-analysis of 225 studies that directly compared the performance of students participating in active versus passive (traditional) STEM courses showed that not only does active learning significantly improve student performance, students in active learning settings were 1.5 times more likely to pass STEM courses (Freeman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation