2013
DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2013.010103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Asset Structure Correlate with Capital Structure? – Cross-Industry and Cross-Size Analysis of the EU Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tangibility has a negative effect on short-term debt ratio for firms in the grey and distressed subsamples, corroborating the results of Scherr and Hulburt (2001) for US firms, Heyman et al. (2003) for Belgian firms, and Koralun-Bereźnicka (2013) for nine European countries, including Portugal. These authors conclude that firms match the maturity of assets with the maturity of financing sources that fund these assets.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Tangibility has a negative effect on short-term debt ratio for firms in the grey and distressed subsamples, corroborating the results of Scherr and Hulburt (2001) for US firms, Heyman et al. (2003) for Belgian firms, and Koralun-Bereźnicka (2013) for nine European countries, including Portugal. These authors conclude that firms match the maturity of assets with the maturity of financing sources that fund these assets.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In concrete, tangible assets are positively related to long-term debt and total leverage, but negatively related to short-term debt. Here the positive relationships tend to support the trade-off theory and the pecking order theory, both of which (based on the collateral value of tangible assets) predict positive effects of tangible assets on increasing debt (Koralun-Bereźnicka, 2013). Furthermore, as stated by Harc (2015), SMEs tend to use collateral to attract long-term debt, thus leaving less collateral for short-term debt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Tangible assets also do not show stable relationship with the debt variables; nonetheless, similar to the findings of Koralun-Bereźnicka (2013), its positive effect on long-term debt and negative effect on short-term debt tend to be clear. Theoretically, as pointed out by Fattouh et al (2008), more tangible assets mean more collateralisable assets, which can lead to higher leverage; however, a negative relationship between asset tangibility and leverage may also exist, as the firms with large amount of tangible assets (especially fixed assets) do not need to invest much and then require less borrowing (Arsov & Naumoski, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Since inflation was a time series attribute compared to others which were panel, it was not appropriate to fit the regression model jointly. Bereźnicka (2013) investigated how asset structure correlates with capital structure in European countries. A correlation research design was adopted and panel data were collected from 2000 to 2010.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%