2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-022-01110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does big-box retail entry affect labor productivity in durable goods retailing? A synthetic control approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on Walmart, Neumark et al (2008) found that an entry resulted in a 2.5% decrease in county‐level retail employment and a 1.5% reduction in retail earnings, while Basker (2005) showed that an entry increases employment in the year of entry, but half of these employment gains disappear over the next five years as other retail establishments contract (see also Basker, 2007; Hicks, 2007, 2008; Jia, 2008 for Walmart's additional entry effects). In a Swedish context, Daunfeldt et al (2017) found that IKEA's entry into some municipalities increased employment by about 17%, while Rudholm et al (2022) showed mixed regional effects, in which smaller regions generally benefitted more from an IKEA establishment than larger regions (see also Håkansson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on Walmart, Neumark et al (2008) found that an entry resulted in a 2.5% decrease in county‐level retail employment and a 1.5% reduction in retail earnings, while Basker (2005) showed that an entry increases employment in the year of entry, but half of these employment gains disappear over the next five years as other retail establishments contract (see also Basker, 2007; Hicks, 2007, 2008; Jia, 2008 for Walmart's additional entry effects). In a Swedish context, Daunfeldt et al (2017) found that IKEA's entry into some municipalities increased employment by about 17%, while Rudholm et al (2022) showed mixed regional effects, in which smaller regions generally benefitted more from an IKEA establishment than larger regions (see also Håkansson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%