2019
DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2019.1640985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does bribery affect a firm’s future growth? Empirical evidence from transition economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, R. Wu (2019) also shows that bribery was found to have a significantly negative impact on both innovation capability and productivity of the observed firms. These negative effects of bribery on innovation capability and productivity are also confirmed in another paper conducted by R. Wu and Meeks (2020) in transition economies in Central Asia and Eastern Europe.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of Paying Briberysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, R. Wu (2019) also shows that bribery was found to have a significantly negative impact on both innovation capability and productivity of the observed firms. These negative effects of bribery on innovation capability and productivity are also confirmed in another paper conducted by R. Wu and Meeks (2020) in transition economies in Central Asia and Eastern Europe.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of Paying Briberysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similarly, Williams et al (2016) also report that productivity growth rates in firms that appreciate bribery payment are higher than other firms. Supporting for a positive effect of bribery payment, R. Wu and Meeks (2020), using data from transition economies in Central Asia and Eastern Europe, find that paying bribery could increase a firm's production output and employment growth significantly, and bribing firms are more likely to bribe again three years later. The previous study also shows the positive effect of paying bribes on innovation engagement.…”
Section: Positive Effects Of Paying Briberymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mariia Blikhar,Mariana Golynska,Bogdana Shandra,Oksana Matviienko,Viktoriia Svyshcho 207 The obtained results allow us to state that property rights had a stronger impact on investments in the 2000s when state property was privatized and consolidated. The inverse dependence on the fight against corruption can mean problems with public investments, like Russia (Zakharov, 2019), or gain from accelerating investment decisions (Dirdi, 2013;Wu et al, 2020) or the ways to circumvent stringent regulatory restrictions (Krammer, 2013). On the other hand, the obtained results may reflect the domestic investment process's specifics, which remain opaque and dependent on various schemes.…”
Section: The Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature does not indicate the high quality of the investment process, which does not contribute to overcoming the economy's raw material orientation. It can be assumed that the departure from the raw material model will affect the nature of the relationship between corruption and investments because innovations and investments in the technology sector mainly require the restriction of corruption (Fu, 2019;Wu et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation