2015
DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlv024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Intimate Partner Violence Differ Depending on Level of Rurality of Residential Area in Spain?

Abstract: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is recognized as a worldwide public health problem. Most theories ascribe IPV to individual, family, or cultural factors. Authors analyzed different residential areas in Spain in terms of IPV frequency as well as its impact on health and the use of services. A standardized self-administered cross-sectional survey was administered to ever-partnered adult women ages 18 to 70 years receiving care at primary health care centers (N = 10,322). Logistic regression analyzed the associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, our findings may not be transferable to communities with more racially or ethnically diverse populations or other geographic locations (e.g., urban areas). For example, in urban areas, the working relationships and communications among networks of support (e.g., healthcare, aging services, faith community) may support older victims differently than in rural areas as there are more programs and portals to enter into services (Annan, 2008; Ruiz-Perez, Vives-Cases, Escriba-Aguir, Rodriguez-Barranco, & Nevot-Cordero, 2015). Victims can go unrecognized more easily in urban than rural areas because they have access to transportation and can go outside of their neighborhood and the watchful eyes of family and friends to seek help from providers who do not know them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, our findings may not be transferable to communities with more racially or ethnically diverse populations or other geographic locations (e.g., urban areas). For example, in urban areas, the working relationships and communications among networks of support (e.g., healthcare, aging services, faith community) may support older victims differently than in rural areas as there are more programs and portals to enter into services (Annan, 2008; Ruiz-Perez, Vives-Cases, Escriba-Aguir, Rodriguez-Barranco, & Nevot-Cordero, 2015). Victims can go unrecognized more easily in urban than rural areas because they have access to transportation and can go outside of their neighborhood and the watchful eyes of family and friends to seek help from providers who do not know them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ciudad de Riobamba, según datos del Ministerio de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda (MIDUVI, 2015), es más pequeña y conservadora que Quito; además tiene índices más altos de pobreza y analfabetismo, lo que, según autores como Campbell et al (2011);Ruiz-Pérez et al, 2015;y, Yuan y Hesketh (2019), está relacionado con el aumento de probabilidad de que las mujeres sufran de VPI. Además, es una ciudad tradicionalmente agrícola semi urbanística (MIDUVI, 2015), que según investigaciones de Peek-Asa et al (2011) y DuBois, Rennison y DeKeseredy (2019), es otro de los factores demográficos que aumenta la vulnerabilidad de las mujeres ante la VPI.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…o separada/divorciada(Montero et al, 2013;Ruiz-Pérez, Vives-Cases, Escribá- Agüir, Rodríguez-Barranco, & Nevot-Cordero, 2015;Vives-Cases et al, 2009) constituyen factores de riesgo. En nuestro estudio hemos constatado un predominio tanto de mujeres como de hombres casados, que residen fundamentalmente en población urbana.…”
unclassified