2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does job-related diversity affect boards' strategic participation? An information-processing approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first hypothesis receives support. This is in line with prior board research that indicated positive effects of board diversity on board strategic tasks (Gabaldon et al, 2018;Kakabadse et al, 2018;Minichilli et al, 2009;Nielsen and Huse, 2010) as well as strategic decisions (Haynes and Hillman, 2010;Miller and Triana, 2009;Torchia et al, 2018). Taken together, these results show the importance of diversity as a variety in directors' skills, knowledge and professional experience, for creating boards that positively contribute to the strategy process.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first hypothesis receives support. This is in line with prior board research that indicated positive effects of board diversity on board strategic tasks (Gabaldon et al, 2018;Kakabadse et al, 2018;Minichilli et al, 2009;Nielsen and Huse, 2010) as well as strategic decisions (Haynes and Hillman, 2010;Miller and Triana, 2009;Torchia et al, 2018). Taken together, these results show the importance of diversity as a variety in directors' skills, knowledge and professional experience, for creating boards that positively contribute to the strategy process.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Accordingly, during board discussions (choice), job-related diversity could help boards battle against decision-making biases (Kakabadse et al, 2018), and look for innovative solutions rather than preserving inertia/decision-making routines (Haynes and Hillman, 2010). All in all, boards empowered by a variety of directors' knowledge, skills and professional experience can be expected to be more active in participating and contributing to the strategy process (Gabaldon et al, 2018):…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study has proposed a multidimensional framework based on drawings of information/decision-making, CEM, and resource-based theory to link outcomes at different levels. In doing so, we address the calls of Gabaldon et al. (2018), who suggested integrating the information/decision-making theory with resource-based to conceptualize a theoretical framework.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building an organizational culture based on the right interpersonal relations contributes to the creation of a positive work atmosphere and trust (Shockley-Zalabak et al, 2010), hence, the psychosocial security of employees in the organization. Diversity management comes down to seeing differences between people in the organization and conscious development of strategies, policies and programs that create a climate for respecting and using these differences for the benefit of the organization (Gabaldon et al, 2018). Its main goal should be to create a work environment in which every person employed can fully realize their potential and has a sense of psychosocial security.…”
Section: Psychosocial Security Of Employees and Diversity Management mentioning
confidence: 99%