2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000227657.75270.c4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does lack of insurance affect use of intensive care? A population-based study*

Abstract: Americans without insurance use ICU services less often than those with insurance, primarily because of decreased likelihood of hospital admission in the first place. Outcome is worse for those who are admitted to the ICU, possibly because they are sicker when they seek care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Danis and colleagues showed that uninsured patients had an increased mortality and were less likely to receive ICU services on a population level (36). An important limitation of this study is a lack of adjustment for severity of illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Danis and colleagues showed that uninsured patients had an increased mortality and were less likely to receive ICU services on a population level (36). An important limitation of this study is a lack of adjustment for severity of illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…61 The implications of differences and similarities must be carefully considered because the structure and context of ICUs affects the process of care. Differences in availability of critical care services influences the ICU patient profile, 62 access to ICU beds, overall case mix ,and clinician workload. 61 Bed availability may influence adoption of clinical practices that may reduce ICU length of stay, such as weaning protocols and daily spontaneous breathing trials, enabling provision of services to more patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one study the author provided us with original data and we used the same models developed in their study to obtain estimates for the specific variables analyzed in this review (11). For a second study that examined mortality, we adjusted the reported OR for age, by combining the log-ORs for different age groups weighted by the inverse of their variance (12). For a third study that compared hospital mortality for managed care to nonmanaged care, we based our estimate of the log-OR on adjusted proportions derived from the survival curves for the two groups (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies reported hospital mortality in relation to insurance status (12,18,20,31,39,43), but one of these did not adjust for potential confounders (18). Among studies that adjusted for potential confounding variables, patients who were critically ill and without health insurance had a higher hospital mortality (OR, 1.16; 95% CI 1.01-1.33) (12,18,31,39,43) (Figure 3).…”
Section: The Association Between Insurance and Care For Patients Who mentioning
confidence: 99%