2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does language impact the learning of mathematics? Comparison of English and Korean speaking university students’ discourses on infinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Korean and in Japanese it is not, as there are two distinct words for "the derivative function" and "the derivative at a point". Kim, Ferrini-Mundy, and Sfard (2012) explore a similar point in the case of discourses on infinity (in the case of learning about infinity in Korean and in English) and use these analyses to interpret the different discourses on infinity of the Korean (apparently more structural and formal) and the English (apparently more procedural and informal) students. Ioannou (2012), in the as yet minimally charted territory of commognitive analyses at university level outside Calculus, focuses on students' first encounters with Group Theory to observe: the intertwined nature of object-level and meta-level learning in Group Theory (for example, when the students learn about equivalence relations and normality); the commognitive conflicts that students experience both within Group Theory and in relation to other mathematical topics that they are engaging with at the same time (for example, in relation to the perceived relevance and usefulness of visual mediation in different mathematical domains); and the adjustments in the approaches to study (such as ways to prepare coursework and revise for examinations) and communicative practice that above discursive shifts imply for students.…”
Section: The Commognitive Approach In University Mathematics Educatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Korean and in Japanese it is not, as there are two distinct words for "the derivative function" and "the derivative at a point". Kim, Ferrini-Mundy, and Sfard (2012) explore a similar point in the case of discourses on infinity (in the case of learning about infinity in Korean and in English) and use these analyses to interpret the different discourses on infinity of the Korean (apparently more structural and formal) and the English (apparently more procedural and informal) students. Ioannou (2012), in the as yet minimally charted territory of commognitive analyses at university level outside Calculus, focuses on students' first encounters with Group Theory to observe: the intertwined nature of object-level and meta-level learning in Group Theory (for example, when the students learn about equivalence relations and normality); the commognitive conflicts that students experience both within Group Theory and in relation to other mathematical topics that they are engaging with at the same time (for example, in relation to the perceived relevance and usefulness of visual mediation in different mathematical domains); and the adjustments in the approaches to study (such as ways to prepare coursework and revise for examinations) and communicative practice that above discursive shifts imply for students.…”
Section: The Commognitive Approach In University Mathematics Educatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study shows that students have difficulties in linking the operational perspective of completeness and the supremum of subsets to the structural concept of real numbers. Based on COF constructs, Kim et al (2012) point out that in the case of the notion of infinity, student understandings are highly correlated to their use of words and visual mediators. According to these researchers, the analysis of the discourses on infinity of Korean and English students can lead to their categorisation in terms of process and object point of views.…”
Section: Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second study (Kim et al, 2012) investigated and compared how native-English and native-Korean speaking university students, who received their education in the U.S. and in Korea respectively, thought about the concept of infinity. The primary motivation for this study was the lexical discontinuity of the Korean infinity discourse and the lexical continuity of the English infinity discourse between everyday and mathematical discourses.…”
Section: Language-dependent Nature Of Mathematics Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework provides insights regarding the importance of culture and language in making sense of particular mathematical concepts and teachers' awareness of the influences of culture and students' uses of everyday language on mathematical learning (Kim et al, 2012). The framework also underlines the importance of teachers' awareness about the development of their students' discourses in terms of the discursive variations across students as well as within an individual student (Wang, 2011).…”
Section: Affordances Implications and Limitations Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%