How does law affect finance? An examination of equity tunneling in Bulgaria

Abstract

Abstract:We model and test the mechanisms through which securities law affects tunneling and tunneling affects firm valuation. In 2002, Bulgaria adopted securities law changes which limit two forms of equity tunneling -dilutive equity offerings and freezeouts. Following the changes, minority shareholders participate equally in secondary equity offers, where before they suffered severe dilution; freezeout offer price/sales ratios quadruple; and Tobin's q rises sharply for firms at high risk of tunneling, relative to lower risk firms. . At the same time, return on assets declines for high-equity-tunneling-risk firms, suggesting that controlling shareholders partly substitute for reduced equity tunneling by engaging in more cash-flow tunneling. We thus present evidence on (i) the importance of legal rules in limiting equity tunneling, (ii) the role of equity tunneling risk as an important factor in determining equity prices; and (iii) substitution by controlling shareholders between different forms of tunneling.Keywords: equity tunneling, preemptive rights, dilution, freezeout, corporate governance, securities law, emerging markets JEL codes: G32, G34, K22 We would like to thank an anonymous referee for greatly improving the paper. We are also grateful to

Governance and the corporate life-cycle

“…Examples include the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the USA, the listing rules on the New York Stock Exchange, and the OECD principles on corporate governance. While there is evidence which says that the implementation of "across the board" rules can work (see Atanasov et al, 2010)), there also exists some evidence that suggests that they may not. For example, "across the board" stock exchange listing requirements do not equally-benefit all firms.…”

Methods for Multicountry Studies of Corporate Governance (and Evidence from the BRIKT Countries)

“…Brazil RPT Subindex (5 elements): RPTs are a core concern in many emerging markets (e.g., Bae, Kang and Kim, 2002;Atanasov et al, 2010). Our RPT subindex includes four elements relating to the existence of RPTs and approval procedures for these transactions.…”

“…Brazil Shareholder Rights Subindex (7 elements): Minority shareholders rights are often seen as an important aspect of governance (e.g., Atanasov et al, 2010;Bennedsen, Nielsen, and Nielsen, 2012).…”

Large Shareholder’s Identity and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from a MENA Market

“…Having good minority shareholder protection laws is essential as the quality of investor protection is positively related to firm value (La Porta et al, 2000), corporate risk taking and firm growth rates (John et al 2008), and efficiency of capital allocation (Wrugler, 2000). Also, it enhances accurate stock price, encourages efficient investment and reduces financial constraints (Mclean et al 2011), enhances stock liquidity (Brockman and Chung, 2003), and limits extraction of firm value by firm's controlling shareholders and managers (Atanasov et al 2010). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how the legal corporate governance mechanism can be improved by pointing out existing laws' merits and loopholes in terms of their ability to protect minority shareholders.…”