How does physical guidance affect motor learning and learner’s workload?

Abstract

[Purpose] Physical guidance is routinely used in clinical practices such as rehabilitation to facilitate motor learning. Physical guidance would facilitate motor learning and reduce the workload; however, this relationship is unknown. Thus, we aimed to investigate this relationship using a physical guidance device. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-seven healthy young adults were randomly assigned to three groups and underwent varying practice conditions. The participants used a physical guidance device during practice for 2 days, did not use the device during practice for 2 days, or used the device on the first but not the second practice day. Motor learning was assessed by measuring the instability generated by the participants while maintaining a standing position on the Biodex Balance System. Psychological status was evaluated by analyzing the participants’ responses to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index. [Results] Improved performance was noted in all participants; however, those who used a physical guidance device during practice for 2 days exhibited poor motor learning compared with those assigned to the other two conditions. Frustration was significantly lower in participants who used a physical guidance device during practice than those who did not. [Conclusion] The use of physical guidance during practice can reduce participant frustration, but excessive physical guidance during practice reduces learning efficiency.

Gait training with a safety suspension device accelerates the achievement of supervision level walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial

“…Yamaguchi et al . [8] investigated the effect of a body guidance device on performance in a standing balance task in healthy participants. A pelvic belt was attached to the waist of the participants as they stood on a circular platform.…”