How does regulation affect the organizational form of foreign banks' presence in developing versus developed countries?

Abstract

Using a unique hand-collected dataset of 1,251 European Union banks and 20,850 foreign affiliates hosted in 154 countries, this paper investigates how both host country and home country regulations affect the decision on where and how to go abroad in developing countries as opposed to developed countries. We find that banks prefer high-income countries with numerous activity restrictions and weaker supervision but less developed countries with less restrictions and stronger supervision. In all cases, they avoid locations with stronger capital regulation than at home. Regarding the choice of foreign organizational form (branches versus subsidiaries), banks rather operate subsidiaries in both high and middle-income countries with stringent entry requirements but prefer branches in developing countries with stringent capital requirements and greater supervisory power. Our findings contribute to the literature examining bank internationalization and have several policy implications for regulatory reforms in developing and developed countries.

Corruption and foreign bank entry denials: A cross‐country panel analysis

“…There are several factors that can affect foreign bank presence such as trade openness (Focarelli & Pozzolo, 2001), growth and financial development (Claessens & Lee, 2003), regulatory restrictions (Bertus et al, 2008; Pamen Nyola et al, 2020), taxes (Claessens & Jansen, 2000). i Corruption is also explored as a possible determinant.…”