2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does social network diversity affect users’ lurking intention toward social network services? A role perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process of questionnaire collection, we first used one screening item to choose relevant persons, and then we removed the invalid questionnaires according to several standards (GWI, 2020). In the post-test, we used the no response bias test, common method bias test, reliability, and validity test to ensure data quality (Liu et al ., 2019b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the process of questionnaire collection, we first used one screening item to choose relevant persons, and then we removed the invalid questionnaires according to several standards (GWI, 2020). In the post-test, we used the no response bias test, common method bias test, reliability, and validity test to ensure data quality (Liu et al ., 2019b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNSs diversify social interactions and superpose social circles; this makes it difficult for users to maintain a consistent ideal image, thus generating role conflict (Liu et al , 2019a). Therefore, to avoid social anxiety caused by self-discrepancy, users disclosing personal information on social networks become more concerned with friends from different social circles who observe their behavior (Besmer et al , 2010); this eventually motivates privacy protection behaviors (Liu et al , 2019b).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While passive users usually show lower levels of user participation, lurkers are related to nonparticipation and non-posting behaviors. Liu et al mentioned some conceptual overlap between lurking and passive use of SNS, that is, the non-publishing behavior on SNS, which leads to lurker related research mainly focused on motivation [11]. "Lurker" is often used to describe someone who observes what is going on and remains silent but does not participate and is thus associated with observation, silence, inactivity/passivity, invisibility, or bystander behavior [22].…”
Section: Passive Users Vs Lurkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not pay much attention to perfecting their personally identifiable information because it is not important when compared to content. Due to time and recognition limitations, increased role conflicts or role overloads can prevent users in the online community from responding to them effectively [11]. However, this is not the case with "online parasites."…”
Section: Online Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation