CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2212776.2212814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does telenoid affect the communication between children in classroom setting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though this study is restricted to MRP systems in the nonanthropomorphic sense, Figure 2 shows some of the more well researched tele-android systems which aim primarily in recreating a more realistic face-toface remote human experience. Geminoid HI-2 [29], shown in Figure 2(a), is the first teleoperated android that very closely resembles a human, while Telenoid (see Figure 2(c)) has opted to adopt minimal human likeness in order to convey a human but unidentifiable presence that is perceived without specific gender or appearance [30,31]. Also other systems which do not fall within the MRP system definition in this paper include the floating avatar (Figure 2(e)) that integrates a blimp with a virtual avatar.…”
Section: Mrp Systems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though this study is restricted to MRP systems in the nonanthropomorphic sense, Figure 2 shows some of the more well researched tele-android systems which aim primarily in recreating a more realistic face-toface remote human experience. Geminoid HI-2 [29], shown in Figure 2(a), is the first teleoperated android that very closely resembles a human, while Telenoid (see Figure 2(c)) has opted to adopt minimal human likeness in order to convey a human but unidentifiable presence that is perceived without specific gender or appearance [30,31]. Also other systems which do not fall within the MRP system definition in this paper include the floating avatar (Figure 2(e)) that integrates a blimp with a virtual avatar.…”
Section: Mrp Systems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Pebbles robot was used to allow sick children to remotely attend classes [17]. Also, Telenoid, a remotely operated robot, was used for children's groupwork; increased participation and pro-activeness were reported, along with the suggestion that communication restrictions imposed by using robots can actually facilitate collaboration [18]. Additionally, a tele-teaching approach was reported with the AV1 robot, where students can use an avatar to remotely attend classes and be present in the classroom; in this approach, the classic robot aspects are more in the background [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a robot could be used by students with a physical disability to carry out physical tasks [36], or students with cancer to remotely attend classes [19]. Moreover, it was suggested that robots' limited capabilities actually facilitate collaboration, e.g., by increasing participation, proactiveness, and stimulation for operators [18,21]. Future work could consider how to share time on robots between multiple students, and provide enhanced sensing capabilities which human students might not have, like the ability to zoom in on slides.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Pebbles robot was used to allow sick children to remotely attend classes [17]. The use of Telenoid, a remotely operated robot, for children's groupwork was explored, reporting increased participation and pro-activeness, and suggesting that communication restrictions imposed by using robots can actually facilitate collaboration [18]. A robot avatar was also used as a telecommunication tool for students that cannot attend classes [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the robot could be used by students with a physical disability to carry out physical tasks [32], or students with cancer to remotely attend classes [19]. Moreover, it was suggested that robots having limited capabilities actually facilitate collaboration, e.g., by increasing participation, proactiveness, and stimulation for operators [18,25].…”
Section: Comparison By Capability and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%