2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
222
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
222
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a simple 50/500 rule of thumb has been applied for a long time as a guidance to determine when genetic threats become relevant to conservation, and to settle the genetic threshold to the minimum size for population viability (the so-called MVP). This rule, used, for example, in the elaboration of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List criteria for threatened species, states that the effective population size (N e ) should be at least 50 to prevent the dramatic consequences from inbreeding depression in the short term, whereas a larger value (N e ⩾ 500) would be needed to preserve adaptive potential in the long term (Franklin, 1980;Jamieson and Allendorf, 2012). As it is well known, these N e values imply considerably larger censuses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a simple 50/500 rule of thumb has been applied for a long time as a guidance to determine when genetic threats become relevant to conservation, and to settle the genetic threshold to the minimum size for population viability (the so-called MVP). This rule, used, for example, in the elaboration of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List criteria for threatened species, states that the effective population size (N e ) should be at least 50 to prevent the dramatic consequences from inbreeding depression in the short term, whereas a larger value (N e ⩾ 500) would be needed to preserve adaptive potential in the long term (Franklin, 1980;Jamieson and Allendorf, 2012). As it is well known, these N e values imply considerably larger censuses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not in accordance with the finding of Wagner (2000), who calculated an MVP for O. germanica of only 20-80 females (or 40-160 individuals) which should provide a population survival probability of 95% over 20 years. Although the MVP can vary substantially across species and even populations (Flather et al, 2012;Jamieson & Allendorf, 2012), Wagner's estimate seems to be too optimistic. First, his results evidently refer to the effective population size, which usually includes only a small proportion of the whole population (Frankham, 1995).…”
Section: Population Of Oedipoda Germanicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective population size (Ne) has long been recognized as an important issue in conservation management [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Genetic estimates of Ne are based on random process of sampling from a real population in a given variance of allele frequency or are based on the amount of inbreeding [5,7], and can make a good prediction of the current status of genetic variation developed over time [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic estimates of Ne are based on random process of sampling from a real population in a given variance of allele frequency or are based on the amount of inbreeding [5,7], and can make a good prediction of the current status of genetic variation developed over time [1]. Ne has been suggested as a major relevant indicator for evaluating the conservation status and threats to the genetic health of populations [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%