2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017tc004776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does the Orientation of a Preexisting Basement Weakness Influence Fault Development During Renewed Rifting? Insights From Three‐Dimensional Discrete Element Modeling

Abstract: The variety in fault geometry, fault interaction style, and evolution of the fault network above a weak planar preexisting fault as a result of a change in the strike angle (α) of the preexisting fault relative to the extension direction is investigated using three-dimensional discrete element modeling. The preexisting fault shows three reactivation modes: (i) full reactivation (α ≥ 60°), (ii) partial reactivation (α = 45°), and (iii) little or no reactivation (α = 30°). A fully reactivated fault decreases the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our models build on previous work that showed how obliquity influences rift geometries at crustal to outcrop scale. Discrete element models by Deng et al (2018) show how fracture patterns at the surface are affected by a pre-existing weakness. Based on analog models, Withjack and Jamison (1986) predict maximum extension direction at oblique rifts (which is perpendicular to orientation of early en-échelon fractures) is a function of the angle between rift trend and displacement of the rift walls.…”
Section: Discussion Analog Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our models build on previous work that showed how obliquity influences rift geometries at crustal to outcrop scale. Discrete element models by Deng et al (2018) show how fracture patterns at the surface are affected by a pre-existing weakness. Based on analog models, Withjack and Jamison (1986) predict maximum extension direction at oblique rifts (which is perpendicular to orientation of early en-échelon fractures) is a function of the angle between rift trend and displacement of the rift walls.…”
Section: Discussion Analog Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fournier and Petit, 2007;Philippon et al, 2015;Brune, 2016;Zwaan and Schreurs, 2017;Ammann et al, 2017), but is opposite to the convention used in almost as many articles (e.g. Tron and Brun, 1991;Teyssier et al, 1995;Clifton and Schlische, 2001;Deng et al, 2018). 5…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Strain migration along individual fault systems is common, typically reflecting fault growth by segment linkage, rheological differences in the deforming host rock, and/or the presence of pre-existing structures (e.g., Cowie et al, 2000;McLeod et al, 2000McLeod et al, , 2002Young et al, 2001;Walsh et al, 2003;Soliva et al, 2006;Putz-Perrier & Sanderson, 2008;Tomasso et al, 2008;Nixon et al, 2014;Whipp et al, 2014;Duffy et al, 2015;. Segment linkage and pre-existing structures played a role in the growth of several fault systems (e.g., segment linkage at Eider Fault System, Figure 6a-b; see also McLeod et al, 2002).…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Changes In The Basin-scale Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical and physical models of rift development, which simulate the formation of upper-crustal deformation, do not, however, commonly consider how strain behaves in three dimensions. This often reflects the limited spatial and temporal resolution of such models, which allows them to only predict the patterns of strain migration in two dimensions (e.g., towards or away from the rift axis) (e.g., McClay, 1990;Cowie et al, 2000;Huismans et al, 2001;Behn et al, 2002;Ziegler & Cloetingh, 2004;Nagel & Buck, 2007;Naliboff et al, 2017). However, observations from individual faults or fault systems (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation