2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jd022079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the spaceborne radar blind zone affect derived surface snowfall statistics in polar regions?

Abstract: Global statistics of snowfall are currently only available from the CloudSat satellite. But CloudSat cannot provide observations of clouds and precipitation within the so‐called blind zone, which is caused by ground‐clutter contamination of the CloudSat radar and covers the last 1200 m above land/ice surface. In this study, the impact of the blind zone of CloudSat on derived snowfall statistics in polar regions is investigated by analyzing three 12 month data sets recorded by ground‐based Micro Rain Radar (MRR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
6
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of LSP on the vertical structure of precipitation raises the question of the interpretation of satellite-borne radar precipitation measurements over the Antarctica continent (23,24) that are currently the only model-free source of information able to cover the entire continent. These measurements must be discarded close to the surface because of ground clutter contamination of the radar signal (24), and the measurements at a certain height (1.2 km for CloudSat and around 0.8 km expected for EarthCare) above the surface are used as a proxy for near-ground precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of LSP on the vertical structure of precipitation raises the question of the interpretation of satellite-borne radar precipitation measurements over the Antarctica continent (23,24) that are currently the only model-free source of information able to cover the entire continent. These measurements must be discarded close to the surface because of ground clutter contamination of the radar signal (24), and the measurements at a certain height (1.2 km for CloudSat and around 0.8 km expected for EarthCare) above the surface are used as a proxy for near-ground precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements must be discarded close to the surface because of ground clutter contamination of the radar signal (24), and the measurements at a certain height (1.2 km for CloudSat and around 0.8 km expected for EarthCare) above the surface are used as a proxy for near-ground precipitation. The vertical structure in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processed data were col- lected with a temporal resolution of 1 min. The potential of the MRR to monitor polar regions has already been highlighted by the works of Maahn et al (2014) and Gorodetskaya et al (2015). The simplicity of its deployment and operation makes it an attractive tool for long-term measurements in places with complex logistics and with limited possibility of support, in the case of instrumental failures.…”
Section: Apres3 Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first estimate of snowfall rates over the AIS was derived from the Cloudsat satellite (Palerme et al, 2014). Its low overpass frequency, narrow swath width and ground clutter remains a limiting factor (Battaglia and Delanoë, 2013;Maahn et al, 2014;Casella et al, 2017). More locally, the operation of ground-based precipitation radars has proven to be an efficient way to detect snowfall over the AIS at several locations (Gorodetskaya et al, 2015;Souverijns et al, 2017;Grazioli et al, 2017a, b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%